Return to KLUBNL.PL main page

rsgb_lf_group
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: LF: OP32

To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: LF: OP32
From: Stefan Schäfer <[email protected]>
Date: Wed, 24 Oct 2012 22:09:32 +0200
In-reply-to: <418E090825C04DFB81593EA54244F640@AGB>
References: <[email protected]> <0D53475605DF40F08BF596E29708823E@AGB> <[email protected]> <418E090825C04DFB81593EA54244F640@AGB>
Reply-to: [email protected]
Sender: [email protected]
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; de; rv:1.9.1.8) Gecko/20100227 Thunderbird/3.0.3


Am 24.10.2012 18:27, schrieb Graham:

May be the path east was better , as you have the same s/n over similar distance , where as east is over land ?

UA0AET is showing as decoding at JA at the moment , may be now is a good time to try Tx while JA is in darkness

The path to JA is (was) not open today, see the DCF plot at http://icas.to/argo/eu.htm Yesterday the QRN was way lower and the signal levels about the same, i.e. the SNR was much better. And i was active to that time of the highest DCF S/N. Anyway no trace at JA8SCD. It's more than twice the distance to JA, compared to UA0AET.

It's interesting that good decode levels, or clear spectrograms, can be seen at UA0SNV. As you say, that distance over land is quite a challenge.

But be sure, it is more likely to leave a trace to the right time and right frequency than making a OP32 decode. That applies for the path to DU1GM too, of course.

73, Stefan/DK7FC



UA0AET    JA8SCD    2200m    OPERA       4163 kms    13:53:08

73 -G..


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>