Return to KLUBNL.PL main page

rsgb_lf_group
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: LF: WSPR tests by DK7FC

To: "[email protected]" <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: LF: WSPR tests by DK7FC
From: Roger Lapthorn <[email protected]>
Date: Tue, 18 Sep 2012 22:17:03 +0100
Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=subject:references:from:content-type:x-mailer:in-reply-to :message-id:date:to:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version; bh=pev4F4KEtgSaW5n5bDWtuJyxf8wiEuY6D26bNoAN648=; b=ygXuOimdO+nb110yeuholTOHU68JBbjaot7BqNQt7rdOU6pxREKE3+I5c9Wg/n/H0h y/jbOvmd1LSdLdjaffKQ2RBkrAF0xJZY+rq+lKJkzYqCPcvsoVR7EZ2ZUXzMrGTtuQeB O7XCnA/OEQsCxUAKMvMCMAir18iMV1Qb2FsXoVBLBkclpOxNkv2DifpuDSdw7wtaXxsk Oolm/8XmEnF3ndRE+1HxAYGkhSdN7lu6SCkZjR5rygkemIdf3hqeR2FlS63fBUhNL2QT 5yXgNyQAeQ+ampNs0Y1UH7zhBvkmKnqEKT8Fjb0F9+kla2GbusNkX3HRuKlM6nH+NwUU o7yg==
In-reply-to: <[email protected]>
References: <[email protected]> <[email protected]>
Reply-to: [email protected]
Sender: [email protected]
Stefan,

Maybe worth using a package like Atomic to ensure your PC time is in sync with time servers? I set mine to sync every few minutes so time is spot on for WSPR. 

73s
Roger G3XBM

-- Via my 2.4GHz transceiver --

On 18 Sep 2012, at 22:04, Stefan Schäfer<[email protected]> wrote:

Hi Klaus, and Marco/IK1HSS,

Thanks for the feedback and reports. It looks like timing is critical here. I don't know why the time delay is changing. Maybe it has to do with the separate tool to generate WSPR-2 which has a fixed time interval between the sequences. The PC i'm using is quite old maybe there are small time delays that are accumulating...

First results are looking fine though. For later regulat transmissions i shall use the program, unless it is possible to generate a 12450 Hz TX tone. For the RX, it is not possible to set the audio BFO tone to 12500 Hz :-( Don't know why it seems to be such a problem to add that possibility. SpecLab and VAC has to do the rest of the work. OK, maybe i would need SpecLab anyway, to realise the 2.5 kHz SSB filter...

As long as some reports are coming in, the time delay cannot be to high. However i think the displayed SNR suffers from this delay.

73, Stefan/DK7FC




Am 18.09.2012 22:31, schrieb [email protected]:
Stefan
you are getting better
1946  -4 -1.8   0.137450  0 DK7FC JN49 30
1956  -4 -1.8   0.137450  0 DK7FC JN49 30
2006  -5 -1.1   0.137450  0 DK7FC JN49 30
2016  -3 -0.5   0.137450  0 DK7FC JN49 30
 
Monitored with indoor loop.
 
Pse disregard the Frequ in last mail, didn't bother to switch as I am not uploading.
Hope that solves you decode problem?
73
de
Klaus
DJ6LB
 
 
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>