Return to KLUBNL.PL main page

rsgb_lf_group
[Top] [All Lists]

LF: RE: Fwd: Re: Ideas for a slower WSPR for the 137 khz band

To: "[email protected]" <[email protected]>, "Edgar J Twining" <[email protected]>
Subject: LF: RE: Fwd: Re: Ideas for a slower WSPR for the 137 khz band
From: Rik Strobbe <[email protected]>
Date: Wed, 12 Sep 2012 13:06:08 +0000
Accept-language: nl-BE, en-US
In-reply-to: <[email protected]>
References: <[email protected]>
Reply-to: [email protected]
Sender: [email protected]
Thread-index: AQHNkOSdUsH3mbfd4ESYP/5JA21+CZeGqnDy
Thread-topic: Fwd: Re: Ideas for a slower WSPR for the 137 khz band

Hello Stefan,

 

BPSK or evn QPSK might be a good choise for daytime 136kHz propagation (surface wave) or 9kHz where paths are indeed stable.

But for nighttime 136kHz and certainly 475/500kHz FSK  seems the better choise. Certainly on 475/500kHz where the very deep QSB is typical at night. It would surprise me that the extreme propagation changes would not affect the phase of the signal.

 

73, Rik  ON7YD - OR7T

 


Van: [email protected] [[email protected]] namens Stefan Schäfer [[email protected]]
Verzonden: woensdag 12 september 2012 14:40
To: [email protected]; Edgar J Twining
Onderwerp: LF: Fwd: Re: Ideas for a slower WSPR for the 137 khz band

Message from Joe/K1JT.

BTW i don't know if it is OK for Joe that his email is forwarded to everyone in the web! But i think it would be OK for him to forward it to a limited number of active radio amateurs operating in the 137 kHz band. So if you make this email public in the web, it is your decision!

73, Stefan/DK7FC

-------- Original-Nachricht --------
Betreff: Re: Ideas for a slower WSPR for the 137 khz band
Datum: Wed, 12 Sep 2012 08:28:47 -0400
Von: Joe Taylor <[email protected]>
An: Stefan Schäfer <[email protected]>


Hi Stefan,

Thanks for your interesting message.

A super-slow version of WSPR (or something like WSPR) should be 
possible, and I might be able to devote some time to writing the 
necessary code.  You should know that I will not be able to get to it 
for several months, however.  Perhaps near the end of this year.

One question for you: It seems to me that propagation at 137 kHz (and 
possibly also 475 kHz) is generally stable enough to make very slow BPSK 
a better modulation scheme than the 4-FSK used in today's WSPR.  Do you 
agree?

	-- 73, Joe, K1JT
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>