Return to KLUBNL.PL main page

rsgb_lf_group
[Top] [All Lists]

RE: LF: Re: Experimental software for WSPR-8 and -32

To: "[email protected]" <[email protected]>
Subject: RE: LF: Re: Experimental software for WSPR-8 and -32
From: Rik Strobbe <[email protected]>
Date: Sat, 22 Sep 2012 21:36:22 +0000
Accept-language: nl-BE, en-US
In-reply-to: <005d01cd98fe$74bc6030$0501a8c0@xphd97xgq27nyf>
References: <7F2208077DA448F78F384AF5B55DECA0@White> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <829FB31FADAD4D4682EC509D2416C9F4@AGB>,<005d01cd98fe$74bc6030$0501a8c0@xphd97xgq27nyf>
Reply-to: [email protected]
Sender: [email protected]
Thread-index: AQHNmNNzMQWnKGL4nU+S9UNCrfyGlJeWWL6AgAAEQACAAG7lb4AAFm7g
Thread-topic: LF: Re: Experimental software for WSPR-8 and -32

1. A linear (class AB push-pull) amplifier can have 60-70% efficiency

2. WSPR is an FSK mode and does NOT need linear amplification

 

73, Rik  ON7YD - OR7T


Van: [email protected] [[email protected]] namens mal hamilton [[email protected]]
Verzonden: zaterdag 22 september 2012 22:11
To: [email protected]
Onderwerp: Re: LF: Re: Experimental software for WSPR-8 and -32

I doubt if WSPR is as good as OPERA taking all things into consideration. WSPR needs Linear PA at 35% efficiency. Opera works with an amplifier in class D or E at 90% efficiency. CW es QRS likewise works with D or E class amp.
You have to look at the bigger picture.
To get a proper evaluation transmit the same ERP with each mode bearing in mind the inefficiency of a Linear amplifier versus a class D or E which is over twice as efficient. The way tests are being conducted at present are too haphazard to be meaningful
Twice as much DC input power is needed with a Linear amp to generate the same ERP as a class D or E.
g3kev
 
----- Original Message -----
From: Graham
Sent: Saturday, September 22, 2012 3:36 PM
Subject: Re: LF: Re: Experimental software for WSPR-8 and -32

Interesting  ...
 
Define  'simple'  ?
 
G..

Sent: Saturday, September 22, 2012 4:21 PM
Subject: Re: LF: Re: Experimental software for WSPR-8 and -32

Hi to all,

only a question to the experts:

is the SLOW WSPR better than the simple OPERA-32 ???

73 de Mauro K1WVQ




At 16.57 22/09/12, you wrote:
Hi Markus, LF,

It works! First reception of DF6NM in WSPR-8 here.

Timestamp Call MHz SNR Drift Grid Pwr Reporter RGrid km az
 2012-09-22 14:40   DF6NM   0.137538   0   0   JN59nj   0.5   DK7FC/8   JN49ik   175   272 
 2012-09-22 14:30   DK7FC   0.137499   +13   0   JN49ik   1   DK7FC/8   JN49ik   0   0

I have used a virtual audio cable, with success.


For those who still try without success, here is my description in simple words.

If your RX is a HF TRX at 136 kHz dial setting, then the tone of DF6NM appears at 1440 Hz, the tone of DK7FC appears at 1430 Hz.

The microphone input is used and it must be defined as the standard audio input device. This is important since the SounInput program related always to the default input.

Then soundinput generates the audio file and replays it in SoundOutput.

SoundOutput replays it to the standard audio output device, which is the virtual audio cable 1 for me. So VAC1 must be defined as the standard output device!

The sound input of the WSPR software must be set to VAC1 too.

The file wspr-8_rx.bat must be edited. If the BFO frequency in the WSPR software is 1500 Hz, then this value must be inserted for fc in the row for the soundoutput settings.

Set the value for fc for soundinput (the row below) to 1450 Hz and save the file.

Then double click wspr-8_rx.bat and wait some minutes. You may watch the small souninput and soundoutput windows...

Hope it works for others as well now.

73, Stefan7DK7FC


Nessun virus nel messaggio in arrivo.
Controllato da AVG - www.avg.com
Versione: 9.0.930 / Database dei virus: 2441.1.1/5285 -  Data di rilascio: 09/22/12 08:34:00
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>