|
Interesting ...
Define 'simple' ?
G..
Sent: Saturday, September 22, 2012 4:21 PM
Subject: Re: LF: Re: Experimental software for WSPR-8 and
-32
Hi to all,
only a question to the experts:
is the
SLOW WSPR better than the simple OPERA-32 ???
73 de Mauro
K1WVQ
At 16.57 22/09/12, you wrote:
Hi Markus, LF,
It works!
First reception of DF6NM in WSPR-8 here.
Timestamp Call MHz SNR Drift
Grid Pwr Reporter RGrid km az
2012-09-22 14:40
DF6NM 0.137538 0 0
JN59nj 0.5 DK7FC/8 JN49ik
175 272
2012-09-22 14:30
DK7FC 0.137499 +13 0
JN49ik 1 DK7FC/8 JN49ik
0 0
I have used a virtual audio cable, with
success.
For those who still try without success, here is my
description in simple words.
If your RX is a HF TRX at 136 kHz dial
setting, then the tone of DF6NM appears at 1440 Hz, the tone of DK7FC appears
at 1430 Hz.
The microphone input is used and it must be defined as the
standard audio input device. This is important since the SounInput program
related always to the default input.
Then soundinput generates the
audio file and replays it in SoundOutput.
SoundOutput replays it to the
standard audio output device, which is the virtual audio cable 1 for me. So
VAC1 must be defined as the standard output device!
The sound input of
the WSPR software must be set to VAC1 too.
The file wspr-8_rx.bat must
be edited. If the BFO frequency in the WSPR software is 1500 Hz, then this
value must be inserted for fc in the row for the soundoutput
settings.
Set the value for fc for soundinput (the row below) to 1450
Hz and save the file.
Then double click wspr-8_rx.bat and wait some
minutes. You may watch the small souninput and soundoutput
windows...
Hope it works for others as well now.
73,
Stefan7DK7FC
Nessun virus nel messaggio in arrivo.
Controllato
da AVG - www.avg.com
Versione: 9.0.930 / Database dei virus: 2441.1.1/5285 - Data di
rilascio: 09/22/12 08:34:00
|
|
