Hi,
>IMVHO,
beaconing test in this precious (because otherwise un-QRMed)
>frequency
range (472.3 to 472.7 kHz) should be kept as short as possible.
>Which
doesn't mean I propose a bandplan.
I sent an email to DL5DBT the day before yesterday,
explaining the situation to him and proposing to use a frequency in the middle
of the band for test transmissions. Didn't get any reply so far, but
yesterday night the frequency was clear again and I had a nice QSO with PA3ABK
(Jan transmitting on 501,6 kHz).
Vy 73
Geri, DK8KW & DI2BO
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Sunday, August 12, 2012 6:26
PM
Subject: Re: LF: 472.5 kHz acty
Hello Uwe,
Aaah yes, that explains all. I
was a bit irritated by that transmission because stations from southern
germany were calling CQ in normal CW about 100 Hz up in frequency. The signal
was completely overloading my receiver's frontend.
I didn't consider
reading the signal as "inverse QRSS keying".
IMVHO, beaconing test in
this precious (because otherwise un-QRMed) frequency range (472.3 to 472.7
kHz) should be kept as short as possible. Which doesn't mean I propose a
bandplan.
All the best,
Wolf .
Am 12.08.2012
17:46, schrieb
[email protected]:
Hello
Wolf,
I received DL5DBT on 472.43kHz extremly strong in QRS3 beacon
mode but - but negativ (!) keying at the time you mentioned.
read
the gaps as key down and you will find that callsign.
GL
Uwe/dj8wx
