Re: LF: Permissible QSY limits for 136

rsgb_lf_group

[Top] [All Lists]

from [Graham]

To:	<[email protected]>
Subject:	Re: LF: Permissible QSY limits for 136
From:	"Graham" <[email protected]>
Date:	Sun, 4 Mar 2012 23:00:17 -0000
Importance:	Normal
In-reply-to:	<12959492286D45E9BB24E80CE57644CD@AGB>
References:	<12959492286D45E9BB24E80CE57644CD@AGB>
Reply-to:	[email protected]
Sender:	[email protected]

Thanks all for info

73-G.

From: Graham

Sent: Sunday, March 04, 2012 1:01 AM

To: [email protected]

Subject: LF: Permissible QSY limits for 136

Permissible QSY limits for 136

Q what is the average Q of a 136 Khz Ae system ? (back garden + larger)

Q What would the maximum acceptable change in frequency +/- Fo before swr considerations became a problem , say 10% reflected power 1 :2 swr ? ....

That's a simple change of frequency from an established resonance and not tracked by auto tuner etc

Tnx -G

G0NBD.

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
LF: Permissible QSY limits for 136, Graham Re: LF: Permissible QSY limits for 136, Stefan Schäfer Re: LF: Permissible QSY limits for 136, Graham Re: LF: Permissible QSY limits for 136, Stefan Schäfer Re: LF: Permissible QSY limits for 136, Clemens Paul Re: LF: Permissible QSY limits for 136, Mike Dennison Re: LF: Permissible QSY limits for 136, Stefan Schäfer Re: LF: Permissible QSY limits for 136, Graham Re: LF: Permissible QSY limits for 136, Graham <=

Previous by Date:	RE: LF: VE9MRC > KL7UK/5 (VX9MRC), Laurence KL7UK
Next by Date:	Re: LF: Permissible QSY limits for 136, Graham
Previous by Thread:	Re: LF: Permissible QSY limits for 136, Graham
Next by Thread:	LF: Short burst of DK7FC on 137, John RABSON
Indexes:	[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]