LF: E-field probe performance

To:	[email protected], [email protected]
Subject:	LF: E-field probe performance
From:	Roger Lapthorn <[email protected]>
Date:	Wed, 28 Mar 2012 13:43:52 +0100
Dkim-signature:	v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=zkcc32d7kU3ZWuafRp4n32m/aw2vE6GqzItI9Vt96lQ=; b=TtYHVtVD3zzpBEJC2DxQtVr8gW+3Zs2bRDj8TDRlf7vLSCPzCYOeVMUdc2fsGSxFw3 Yq9i0hnvuWemkZ9L3rTBZ/agYVapg+mo9zwJTEa8pM5Ef4O3no+sWVijY0dX6GebY9QY rB6zeGUN1ZiHbAbMWF68g6jXyQ/XcpmHChIrn3LcpJSSMYkY+IjTQuTU3zsj24hZslLV nQOMG1G/lkn12yQ4/RO6GPQbhmQfe94PQ3a/G3naaiIYP2OMfvB7Nb9m4Z12pKYOpaEo 73l33l5s2C+BDx5rPgGNd/Tj7WHan23mhVHzAeBLiRYh2TW1/pidXu0HIZkJJBkZuvpf EHQg==
Reply-to:	[email protected]
Sender:	[email protected]

Several of the VLF grabbers are now using Stefan DK7FC's E-field probe (Tel Aviv, Ipswich, Iceland etc). I'm wondering if anyone has done a straight comparison against the PA0RDT design and measured which is better in terms of sensitivity and dynamic range?

73s
Roger G3XBM

--
http://qss2.blogspot.com/
http://g3xbm-qrp.blogspot.com/
http://www.g3xbm.co.uk
https://sites.google.com/site/sub9khz/

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
LF: E-field probe performance, Roger Lapthorn <= Re: LF: E-field probe performance, ALAN MELIA

Previous by Date:	LF: 24h of 8.970KHz in Appingedam @ PA1SDB, PA1SDB, Peter
Next by Date:	Re: LF: E-field probe performance, ALAN MELIA
Previous by Thread:	LF: Bill Ashlock SK, Warren Ziegler
Next by Thread:	Re: LF: E-field probe performance, ALAN MELIA
Indexes:	[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]