Return to KLUBNL.PL main page
| To: | <[email protected]> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: LF: 475 calling frequency |
| From: | [email protected] |
| Date: | 25 Feb 2012 16:02 GMT |
| In-reply-to: | <[email protected]> |
| References: | <004a01ccf317$38d48170$0401a8c0@xphd97xgq27nyf> <D1209458E04C404281AC6C5314E62B4F@lindavideo> <CAHAQVWMN86R3D7ksoWkh_E5oOfiXr-8kw__eF9XVekBz71NHww@mail.gmail.com> <6C0C76B97330431C8D2C9F94BDD77757@GaryPC> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> |
| Reply-to: | [email protected] |
| Sender: | [email protected] |
Dear all, this would remember many operators of the old way 500 kHz had been used, of course. But to recommend an easier way of modulation, a small FM deviation for the carrier (F2) modulated with 500 Hz would give the same sound when demodulated by a product detector! But for the time being I guess the main problem is that the band becomes really popular in CW! 73 Ha-Jo, DJ1ZB "John Rabson" <[email protected]> schrieb: > LF/MF, > > Should we have a specific calling frequency in this allocation, and should it > be the practice to use MCW on that channel? > > F5VLF (tongue in cheek) > |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | LF: VX9BDQ overnight, John Bruce McCreath |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | LF: Re: CQ 500, mal hamilton |
| Previous by Thread: | LF: 475 calling frequency, John Rabson |
| Next by Thread: | Re: LF: RE: 500 UK renewa l- Latest News, [email protected] |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |