Return to KLUBNL.PL main page
| To: | [email protected] |
|---|---|
| Subject: | LF: OPERA and QRS |
| From: | qrss <[email protected]> |
| Date: | Wed, 01 Feb 2012 10:20:44 +0000 |
| Reply-to: | [email protected] |
| Sender: | [email protected] |
| User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1; rv:9.0) Gecko/20111222 Thunderbird/9.0.1 |
We all seem to have agreed to compare OPERA with a QRS speed which takes the same time to send a call sign, correct or not? A QRS beacon can send the call continuously all day and successive periods are often used to establish the information. How about comparing like for like in the timing of Data Bits, OPERA uses digital techniques and no doubt repeats the data in the 4 minute period of OP4. In this case we would need to be comparing it with QRS1 or QRS1.025 if you like. I feed a coding session coming on. 73 Eddie G3ZJO |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: LF: Re: Opera v qrs evaluation, mal hamilton |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: LF: Re: Opera v qrs evaluation, qrss |
| Previous by Thread: | LF: DK7FC hell audible in Moscow, Alex K |
| Next by Thread: | Re: LF: OPERA and QRS, Andy Talbot |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |