Return to KLUBNL.PL main page
| To: | <[email protected]> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: LF: WOLF DATA MODE S/N FIG ? |
| From: | "James Moritz" <[email protected]> |
| Date: | Sat, 28 Jan 2012 20:30:31 -0000 |
| Dkim-signature: | v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=btopenworld.com; s=s1024; t=1327782618; bh=3Uk6nMGGWAh4uVsNB8vbldLKvU0UMYc6tQ3SlmYkwpo=; h=X-Yahoo-Newman-Property:X-YMail-OSG:X-Yahoo-SMTP:Received:Message-ID:From:To:References:In-Reply-To:Subject:Date:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:X-Priority:X-MSMail-Priority:X-Mailer:X-MimeOLE; b=6DFk75/IDaZdNB+Q5YUujoCnKyty9Yj6XbD1+5vH/fSlkvCDv7UVBRsGFHxJzc0uA/qr5mFM3V0CWiBO5UiAqAWv0yyr6dTKbzkrL/xm/vsNs1nnwbnKx09NTunHtA3oApov7RuNn1zHmpGGFaC2MH8a40JuSbUK1rYdc2/DcDo= |
| Domainkey-signature: | a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=btopenworld.com; h=DKIM-Signature:X-Yahoo-Newman-Property:X-YMail-OSG:X-Yahoo-SMTP:Received:Message-ID:From:To:References:In-Reply-To:Subject:Date:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:X-Priority:X-MSMail-Priority:X-Mailer:X-MimeOLE; b=jPcY2SgjxI2s/UXqocspySVBybwn3zjNrmE4YeqwXDmjxd4UVeq23WMv6UH/hRhTnn4HW61P6Ca3h4l1pGlgEWiX1VYjno261bizOxnjRsXGsG4mjjj+xxsnMwLU2K8QamMGcN98mLOXrnWVGdhw2a/4RjOiOz0brjE25redj+k= ; |
| Domainkey-status: | good (testing) |
| In-reply-to: | <CAA8k23Rm-kX4nz4nOcaD6Rrbh7-cd+OiP1Jra+SVHriaFwdcMQ@mail.gmail.com> |
| References: | <3992CC59F7A14AA694628529761EC5DE@AGB><[email protected]> <CAA8k23Rm-kX4nz4nOcaD6Rrbh7-cd+OiP1Jra+SVHriaFwdcMQ@mail.gmail.com> |
| Reply-to: | [email protected] |
| Sender: | [email protected] |
Dear Andy, LF Group, So by continuously looking at repeated message, the effective bandwidth will get lower by the average of the number of times it has been repeated. Two repeats 3dB or half BW, 4 repeats 6dB , 8 repeeats 9dB etc etc Does this seem about right ? Well, I cannot claim any expert knowledge, but I'm sure that must be the intention. Presumably the limit to which this can be done is determined by the ability of the decoder to successfully detect the pseudo-random sequence. I guess it has to do this separately for each 96 second message in order to get the carrier phase for that message. Cheers, Jim Moritz73 de M0BMU |
| Previous by Date: | Re: WOLF: 135975 Hz, 10 b/s - Saturday evening, John Andrews |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | LF: WD2XES WOLF Saturday Night, John Andrews |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: LF: WOLF DATA MODE S/N FIG ?, Andy Talbot |
| Next by Thread: | Re: LF: WOLF DATA MODE S/N FIG ?, Andy Talbot |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |