Re: LF: Opera beacons

To:	[email protected]
Subject:	Re: LF: Opera beacons
From:	Andy Talbot <[email protected]>
Date:	Mon, 23 Jan 2012 18:26:51 +0000
Dkim-signature:	v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=hHcwwuhtcAB/Kv+NZZy3LZZPPBRAOwVQs8P2oe/kjAk=; b=P+xM1l5jW9r70aAPw8Jtuz7enEmEoreNuVpNED8aPz1fLeQEfG7R+T/F1YGBjsX2hD uqnB7LDT6v6wYXYBsWgvQwWLf/Y1VhFkVve+ZeT0n+Tnx1xwuw6t6bhp2glNoLtQNHJ0 cmA+jkx2xBPryFxoaSyFB8eJT0s9aLtqjD1Gs=
In-reply-to:	<[email protected]>
References:	<[email protected]>
Reply-to:	[email protected]
Sender:	[email protected]

It doesn't matter.
The decoding of the previous transmission can take place while the
current one is being received.

My PIC source, in 100% duty cycle mode, just sends the sequence end to
end with no gap, and the decoder had not problems with that

'jnt


On 23 January 2012 17:08, Mike Dennison <[email protected]> wrote:
> I notice that some Opera stations beacon at intervals shorter than
> the length of their beacon, which presumably means the beacon is
> running continuously.
>
> Is this useful? It does not leave any space for the beacon station,
> or those near him, to receive. Or have I missed something?
>
> Mike, G3XDV
> ==========
>

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
LF: Opera beacons, Mike Dennison Re: LF: Opera beacons, Andy Talbot <= Re: LF: Opera beacons, Graham

Previous by Date:	Re: LF: Netbooks and VLF/LF software, wolf_dl4yhf
Next by Date:	LF: Opera beacons, Mike Dennison
Previous by Thread:	LF: Opera beacons, Mike Dennison
Next by Thread:	Re: LF: Opera beacons, Graham
Indexes:	[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]