Hi Mal,
Surely you jest, the reference is to the beatitudes as they appear
in the Gospel of Matthew:
" Blessed are:
...
the meek: for they shall inherit the earth. "
73 Warren
On Wed, Nov 2, 2011 at 3:15 PM, mal hamilton <[email protected]> wrote:
> Warren
> A magazine I expect that I am not familiar with
> mal/g3kev
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Warren Ziegler" <[email protected]>
> To: <[email protected]>
> Sent: Wednesday, November 02, 2011 6:59 PM
> Subject: Re: LF: 5 Whats?
>
>
> Mal,
>
> Matthew 5:5
> King James version
>
> 73 Warren
>
>
> On Wed, Nov 2, 2011 at 2:42 PM, mal hamilton <[email protected]> wrote:
>> Correct !! especially over your way but in the UK the Appliance Operator
>> punter thinks only in terms of uWatts. Just read the emails on here.
>> de mal/g3kev
>>
>> ----- Original Message -----
>> From: "Warren Ziegler" <[email protected]>
>> To: <[email protected]>
>> Sent: Wednesday, November 02, 2011 6:30 PM
>> Subject: Re: LF: 5 Whats?
>>
>>
>> Mal,
>>
>> I know some hams here that seem interested in 500kHz but when
>> they find out the ARRL experimental license is for 20W ERP CW, PSK and
>> WSPR on a total band of 27kHz they lose interest.
>>
>> I image that even fewer will be interested in 5W and 8 kHz
>>
>> --
>> 73 Warren K2ORS
>> WD2XGJ
>> WD2XSH/23
>> WE2XEB/2
>> WE2XGR/1
>>
>>
>>
>> On Wed, Nov 2, 2011 at 1:08 PM, mal hamilton <[email protected]>
> wrote:
>>> Warren
>>> At the present time it is a Bodge anyway. I can understand the commercial
>>> interest, also a lot of Hams are not really interested in the band. There
>>> are only about 3 UK stns that I hear on the odd time in QSO mode, a few
>>> others around EU are belching out beacons and QSL via internet, hardly
>>> impressive to those that issue Permits. If the plug was pulled I would
> not
>>> be too concerned because 160 metres is similar but has a big occupancy
>> with
>>> QSO MODE being the norm, mostly CW with some SSB.
>>> On LF it is the same tale, although this is now an International band
>> there
>>> is very little interest, in fact the band occupancy has gone down over
> the
>>> years.
>>> It is now the same half dozen on the band daily and mostly Beacon mode
> qsl
>>> via internet. The odd QRS 600000000000 does take place but virtually no
>> CW.
>>> At present I would say that LF es MF is a total waste of time and effort
>>> I have 4 nice Decca amps Hi Band for 137 going Rusty!!!!!!! in spite of
>> this
>>> I am still using my 1Kw h/brew. CQ on CW but no replies.
>>>
>>> mal/g3kev
>>>
>>> ----- Original Message -----
>>> From: "Warren Ziegler" <[email protected]>
>>> To: <[email protected]>
>>> Sent: Wednesday, November 02, 2011 4:41 PM
>>> Subject: Re: LF: 5 Whats?
>>>
>>>
>>> Mal,
>>>
>>> The maritime industry trade group has been pushing back against
>>> hams on 500kHz in the hope that they can persuade governments to fund
>>> a new relatively broadband data service there.
>>> The maritime group has standing with CEPT and the ITU and they
>>> apparently have money and effective lobbyists behind them, the hams on
>>> the other hand are left to pick up scraps that fall off the table and
>>> are expected to be thankful for them!
>>>
>>> --
>>> 73 Warren K2ORS
>>> WD2XGJ
>>> WD2XSH/23
>>> WE2XEB/2
>>> WE2XGR/1
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Wed, Nov 2, 2011 at 12:33 PM, mal hamilton <[email protected]>
>> wrote:
>>>> MF
>>>> How did they arrive at that frequency range? No where near where we are
>> at
>>>> present. New VFO'S and Xtals etc
>>>> de mal/g3kev
>>>>
>>>> ----- Original Message -----
>>>> From: "Warren Ziegler" <[email protected]>
>>>> To: <[email protected]>
>>>> Sent: Wednesday, November 02, 2011 3:34 PM
>>>> Subject: Re: LF: 5 Whats?
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Hi Laurence,
>>>>
>>>> 5 Watts? Do we get to have 40 channels and use a 'power mic' with
>>>> reverb?
>>>> Come On!
>>>>
>>>> 73 Warren K2ORS
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Wed, Nov 2, 2011 at 11:24 AM, Laurence KL7UK
>>>> <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>> During the meeting of the CEPT WRC-12 Conference Preparatory Group held
>>> in
>>>>> Bucharest between November 1st-4th 2011 an European Common Proposal was
>>>>> agreed. This ECP represents the block vote of 48 administrations and
> was
>>>>> passed without dissent. It proposes an allocation to the amateur
> service
>>>>> between 472-480 kHz on a secondary basis with a maximum power limit of
>> 5W
>>>>> eirp.
>>>>> This ECP will now be forwarded to the ITU as a contribution from CEPT.
>>>>> I would like to take this opportunity to thank all of those who
>>>> participated
>>>>> in the work of the working group that led to the adoption of this
>>>>> proposal. Also thanks are due to those European Member Societies who
>>>>> helped to influence their national administrations in this matter.
>>>>> Now for WRC-12.
>>>>> Colin, G3PSM
>>>>> CEPT Co-ordinator for Agenda Item 1.23
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Laurence KL7UK
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> 73 Warren K2ORS
>>>> WD2XGJ
>>>> WD2XSH/23
>>>> WE2XEB/2
>>>> WE2XGR/1
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
>
>
> --
> 73 Warren K2ORS
> WD2XGJ
> WD2XSH/23
> WE2XEB/2
> WE2XGR/1
>
>
>
>
--
73 Warren K2ORS
WD2XGJ
WD2XSH/23
WE2XEB/2
WE2XGR/1
|
