Re: LF: 5 Whats?

["Graham" <g8fzk@g8fzk.fsnet.co.uk>]

Starting to  read like the   script  for  the  Hit in  Pulp Fiction ....

Ezekiel 25:17

--------------------------------------------------
From: "mal hamilton" <g3kevmal@talktalk.net>
Sent: Wednesday, November 02, 2011 7:15 PM
To: <rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org>
Subject: Re: LF: 5 Whats?

> Warren
> A magazine I expect that I am not familiar with
> mal/g3kev
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Warren Ziegler" <wd2xgj@gmail.com>
> To: <rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org>
> Sent: Wednesday, November 02, 2011 6:59 PM
> Subject: Re: LF: 5 Whats?
>
>
> Mal,
>
>  Matthew 5:5
> King James version
>
> 73 Warren
>
>
> On Wed, Nov 2, 2011 at 2:42 PM, mal hamilton <g3kevmal@talktalk.net> 
> wrote:
> > Correct !! especially over your way but in the UK the Appliance Operator
> > punter thinks only in terms of uWatts. Just read the emails on here.
> > de mal/g3kev
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "Warren Ziegler" <wd2xgj@gmail.com>
> > To: <rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org>
> > Sent: Wednesday, November 02, 2011 6:30 PM
> > Subject: Re: LF: 5 Whats?
> >
> >
> > Mal,
> >
> > I know some hams here that seem interested in 500kHz but when
> > they find out the ARRL experimental license is for 20W ERP CW, PSK and
> > WSPR on a total band of 27kHz they lose interest.
> >
> > I image that even fewer will be interested in 5W and 8 kHz
> >
> > --
> > 73 Warren K2ORS
> > WD2XGJ
> > WD2XSH/23
> > WE2XEB/2
> > WE2XGR/1
> >
> >
> >
> > On Wed, Nov 2, 2011 at 1:08 PM, mal hamilton <g3kevmal@talktalk.net>
> wrote:
> > > Warren
> > > At the present time it is a Bodge anyway. I can understand the 
> > > commercial
> > > interest, also a lot of Hams are not really interested in the band. 
> > > There
> > > are only about 3 UK stns that I hear on the odd time in QSO mode, a few
> > > others around EU are belching out beacons and QSL via internet, hardly
> > > impressive to those that issue Permits. If the plug was pulled I would
> not
> > > be too concerned because 160 metres is similar but has a big occupancy
> > with
> > > QSO MODE being the norm, mostly CW with some SSB.
> > > On LF it is the same tale, although this is now an International band
> > there
> > > is very little interest, in fact the band occupancy has gone down over
> the
> > > years.
> > > It is now the same half dozen on the band daily and mostly Beacon mode
> qsl
> > > via internet. The odd QRS 600000000000 does take place but virtually no
> > CW.
> > > At present I would say that LF es MF is a total waste of time and effort
> > > I have 4 nice Decca amps Hi Band for 137 going Rusty!!!!!!! in spite of
> > this
> > > I am still using my 1Kw h/brew. CQ on CW but no replies.
> > >
> > > mal/g3kev
> > >
> > > ----- Original Message -----
> > > From: "Warren Ziegler" <wd2xgj@gmail.com>
> > > To: <rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org>
> > > Sent: Wednesday, November 02, 2011 4:41 PM
> > > Subject: Re: LF: 5 Whats?
> > >
> > >
> > > Mal,
> > >
> > > The maritime industry trade group has been pushing back against
> > > hams on 500kHz in the hope that they can persuade governments to fund
> > > a new relatively broadband data service there.
> > > The maritime group has standing with CEPT and the ITU and they
> > > apparently have money and effective lobbyists behind them, the hams on
> > > the other hand are left to pick up scraps that fall off the table and
> > > are expected to be thankful for them!
> > >
> > > --
> > > 73 Warren K2ORS
> > > WD2XGJ
> > > WD2XSH/23
> > > WE2XEB/2
> > > WE2XGR/1
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > On Wed, Nov 2, 2011 at 12:33 PM, mal hamilton <g3kevmal@talktalk.net>
> > wrote:
> > > > MF
> > > > How did they arrive at that frequency range? No where near where we are
> > at
> > > > present. New VFO'S and Xtals etc
> > > > de mal/g3kev
> > > >
> > > > ----- Original Message -----
> > > > From: "Warren Ziegler" <wd2xgj@gmail.com>
> > > > To: <rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org>
> > > > Sent: Wednesday, November 02, 2011 3:34 PM
> > > > Subject: Re: LF: 5 Whats?
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Hi Laurence,
> > > >
> > > > 5 Watts? Do we get to have 40 channels and use a 'power mic' with
> > > > reverb?
> > > > Come On!
> > > >
> > > > 73 Warren K2ORS
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > On Wed, Nov 2, 2011 at 11:24 AM, Laurence KL7UK
> > > > <hellozerohellozero@hotmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > During the meeting of the CEPT WRC-12 Conference Preparatory Group 
> > > > > held
> > > in
> > > > > Bucharest between November 1st-4th 2011 an European Common Proposal 
> > > > > was
> > > > > agreed. This ECP represents the block vote of 48 administrations and
> was
> > > > > passed without dissent. It proposes an allocation to the amateur
> service
> > > > > between 472-480 kHz on a secondary basis with a maximum power limit of
> > 5W
> > > > > eirp.
> > > > > This ECP will now be forwarded to the ITU as a contribution from CEPT.
> > > > > I would like to take this opportunity to thank all of those who
> > > > participated
> > > > > in the work of the working group that led to the adoption of this
> > > > > proposal. Also thanks are due to those European Member Societies who
> > > > > helped to influence their national administrations in this matter.
> > > > > Now for WRC-12.
> > > > > Colin, G3PSM
> > > > > CEPT Co-ordinator for Agenda Item 1.23
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > Laurence KL7UK
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > 73 Warren K2ORS
> > > > WD2XGJ
> > > > WD2XSH/23
> > > > WE2XEB/2
> > > > WE2XGR/1
>
>
> --
> 73 Warren K2ORS
> WD2XGJ
> WD2XSH/23
> WE2XEB/2
> WE2XGR/1