To: | [email protected] |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: LF: Re: RSGB Convention MF side looks a bit thin ?? |
From: | John Rabson <[email protected]> |
Date: | Thu, 6 Oct 2011 02:46:07 +0200 |
In-reply-to: | <1317857588.4715.4.camel@pat-compaq-evo> |
References: | <DF04F1B426284824AAC4CCC935179578@AGB> <00d101cc8385$36ca2c10$4001a8c0@lark> <96322D70F9974098BE3BAD32EC55648F@AGB> <CAA8k23TuRdafPnVmd0Y8YgoWRMzL5_8mjbbUizkuksSadWzjyA@mail.gmail.com> <1317850793.4144.27.camel@pat-compaq-evo> <000d01cc83aa$41c1ca40$0401a8c0@xphd97xgq27nyf> <1317857588.4715.4.camel@pat-compaq-evo> |
Reply-to: | [email protected] |
Sender: | [email protected] |
On 6 Oct 2011, at 01:33CEST, g4gvw wrote: > Ahh! Well, Mal but we still differ! I prefer the term Radio > Experimenter. Isn't that what the EIs used to be called? John F5VLF |
Previous by Date: | Re: LF: Re: RSGB Convention MF side looks a bit thin ??, g4gvw |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: LF: Re: RSGB Convention MF side looks a bit thin ??, g4gvw |
Previous by Thread: | Re: LF: Re: RSGB Convention MF side looks a bit thin ??, g4gvw |
Next by Thread: | Re: LF: Re: RSGB Convention MF side looks a bit thin ??, g4gvw |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |