Return to KLUBNL.PL main page

rsgb_lf_group
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: LF: vo1na 27-10.jpg

To: <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: LF: vo1na 27-10.jpg
From: "mal hamilton" <[email protected]>
Date: Thu, 27 Oct 2011 16:28:09 -0000
References: <FF44FA94CE764FE9876F6FC15199B0E6@acer> <[email protected]>
Reply-to: [email protected]
Sender: [email protected]
Stefan
The majority of signals on LF es MF are suitable for a QSO but the present culture seems to favour BEACONS, QRS MODE when it is not necessary and QSL via Internet.
In the beginning it was all CW QSO mode and it worked FB.
I do not bother any more because it is a waste of time listening/watching useless repeative part callsigns.
It has all been done before and better so what are current operators trying to achieve.
My suggestion is to get back to CW QSO mode, use QRS only under vy poor propagation condx if you think it helps.
Use LF es MF like all the other bands, HF es VHF where CW is the norm, SSB as appropriate and likewise data modes.
73 de mal/g3kev
 
 
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Thursday, October 27, 2011 9:34 AM
Subject: Re: LF: vo1na 27-10.jpg

Hi Joe, LF,

Your signal in a QRSS-10 window. Would be suitable for a QSO :-)
http://dl.dropbox.com/u/19882028/LF/10_402283.jpg

73, Stefan/DK7FC

Am 27.10.2011 10:35, schrieb henny van elst:
Gm LF,
Capture vo1na,
henny pa3cpm
73's
Het bericht kan nu met het volgende bijlagen of koppelingen worden verzonden:
vo1na 27-10.jpg

Opmerking: Sommige e-mailprogramma's staan ter beveiliging tegen virussen het verzenden of ontvangen van bepaalde bestandsbijlagen niet toe. Controleer de beveiligingsinstellingen voor uw e-mail als u wilt weten hoe bijlagen worden afgehandeld.
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>