Return to KLUBNL.PL main page

rsgb_lf_group
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: LF: Poor antennas

To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: LF: Poor antennas
From: Warren Ziegler <[email protected]>
Date: Tue, 2 Aug 2011 15:13:01 -0400
Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=lXXssYgkQ1sREDduN79NGkI2T6dAHko58OQCy3Lybuo=; b=lm76x9QiV1c4MeNCH0AtI9sDWOv6QdFgQl0KGZ10ULZ44aZnM+CqjtgZOl48SE0vcq ykgldfW3hGIIbvh3oKYJDJAjS38mpMkY0yC/x8KxlqTaKl+NquN/SF4feV4H0sKhiH4g GDBpZAyS2R7Zz0UdjZq6ZYZD6XvZl4twWE4j4=
In-reply-to: <001601cc5147$61942b50$0401a8c0@xphd97xgq27nyf>
References: <001601cc5147$61942b50$0401a8c0@xphd97xgq27nyf>
Reply-to: [email protected]
Sender: [email protected]
Mal,

  Don't discount the increased interference from switching power
supplies, plasma televisions, PLTs and the like.
Everyone is battling a higher noise floor these days.

My suggestion: get a sail boat and operate from it!


-- 
73 Warren K2ORS
                WD2XGJ
                WD2XSH/23
                WE2XEB/2
                WE2XGR/1



On Tue, Aug 2, 2011 at 3:07 PM, mal hamilton <[email protected]> wrote:
> LF
> It now takes hundreds of watts to be observed or heard around EU on 137 Khz
> whereas some years back less than 200 watts achieved a good result like a
> QSO on CW. The 130 watt Ropex used by many resulted in many CW QSO'S,
> In those days most Amateurs were using normal antennas like loaded inv L
> systems or some sort of vertical for both RX es TX.
> At present the trend seems to be probe or small loop antennas and these do
> not seem to produce enough signal capture to the RX.
> The DX that I have worked in the past all had large antenna systems.
> These are my observations, maybe others have another theory.
> de mal/g3kev
>


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>