Return to KLUBNL.PL main page

rsgb_lf_group
[Top] [All Lists]

LF: Antennas

To: "RSGB LF Group" <[email protected]>
Subject: LF: Antennas
From: "Chris" <[email protected]>
Date: Wed, 3 Aug 2011 19:08:38 +0100
Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=btinternet.com; s=s1024; t=1312394904; bh=jjHzv9wdC762IRBCDxfNE3IXl47fcf/m0nfbVLmI6iU=; h=X-Yahoo-Newman-Property:X-YMail-OSG:X-Yahoo-SMTP:Received:Message-ID:From:To:Subject:Date:MIME-Version:Content-Type:X-Priority:X-MSMail-Priority:X-Mailer:X-MimeOLE; b=jMoEGZYILwhKfBtjWQceWSvgdgeDMPhnbgdIxmyrmHLEk8CD9ApsaWEQ2UzOznY9tmYzN5Qm60E5//muz/RlZZRMF5nCM0zCd7EVFJIbc3efC75LQzUZu8VaGan2DgfbGQtdMZvLbQILSUutxsZTuz/zfc4ZSQh5doochVM8y3A=
Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=btinternet.com; h=DKIM-Signature:X-Yahoo-Newman-Property:X-YMail-OSG:X-Yahoo-SMTP:Received:Message-ID:From:To:Subject:Date:MIME-Version:Content-Type:X-Priority:X-MSMail-Priority:X-Mailer:X-MimeOLE; b=c0ssIMG+LUVTsbjlFygt32RYTvPvAv9DPvy6Gvc6XVBVbeKb1cdCKXDGbid+XGST1D5g16JXryfIWqh9Ty9tlPNLY364dn6WI/aSyR2YHUJBaUcTsnM2pEvcUDZR8lxn+b/Td8qtESrf4+FnefLZVB3W1+nF5D7wPlN2Vzdg7R4= ;
Domainkey-status: good (testing)
Reply-to: [email protected]
Sender: [email protected]
Hi Mal and LF,
Well, all I can say is that here the signal to noise ratio on RX is better on my PA0RDT than it is on my long wire (inverted 'L'). I have always thought this a bit strange, quite often weak signals that cannot be seen on the wire are perfectly copied on the PA0RDT. This applies from 136kHz to 3.8MHz. I cannot see what else it can be other than local noise/QRM level. 80m is another prime example where the noise has gradually got worse over the years here.
Vy 73,
Chris, G4AYT, Whitstable, Kent.
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>