To: | <[email protected]> |
---|---|
Subject: | LF: Re: test |
From: | "Alan Melia" <[email protected]> |
Date: | Sat, 6 Aug 2011 18:37:47 +0100 |
Dkim-signature: | v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=btinternet.com; s=s1024; t=1312652274; bh=d5tge3Kxx0BCOPy2KGLsHKRgb146tzfQ9DlaYhRRVwM=; h=X-Yahoo-Newman-Property:X-YMail-OSG:X-Yahoo-SMTP:Received:Message-ID:From:To:References:Subject:Date:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:X-Priority:X-MSMail-Priority:X-Mailer:X-MimeOLE; b=gCkPxKzUFcetNVJcp+OUOWrqSsKyHjua7jySjiPjqGaYPoyokX51LSxwVeHzqxbesZWe11dS0okfPGkpp3Z/MlYLU71CjlU++g50Y2EqiNMCgKYQ1RBEf/sFM32tLYJe1iZQA3Ki5VVFB5sJBEuFSxYrREZ5yNdF2Qn2IHrvix0= |
Domainkey-signature: | a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=btinternet.com; h=DKIM-Signature:X-Yahoo-Newman-Property:X-YMail-OSG:X-Yahoo-SMTP:Received:Message-ID:From:To:References:Subject:Date:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:X-Priority:X-MSMail-Priority:X-Mailer:X-MimeOLE; b=0vr79SkEPzKO/ZVB711zxx4GxEEG9XiLC163IPWpLcRfx1PTrLR7rWHVIbvxllivrUk27lQy1qFjxy8JNKNHlHq4io9U6GE0kdwxVe55nq7xYGFnlBXWUsO+xv80h7WzqdZnw5zPNz8p47zOvJ//dDxiBo3wNF75i9lzfe4W0Ys= ; |
Domainkey-status: | good (testing) |
References: | <6D22E80876A64669A90346E1C7769908@White> |
Reply-to: | [email protected] |
Sender: | [email protected] |
Hi Markus my reflect time is just 2 min later than the post time in the message. Looking at the header when you disentangle the local time time-stamps it would seem that there as no delay in Blacksheep handling it. I wonder when it was posted and when you received the response. I only know the time of my receipt of course not the time when your copy would be sent. Similar with the QSY mesage. I wonder which path inwards or outward is experiencing the delay. Alan G3NYK ----- Original Message ----- From: "Markus Vester" <[email protected]> To: <[email protected]> Sent: Saturday, August 06, 2011 7:53 AM Subject: LF: test it seems like the RSGB reflector has been rather an absorber again... 73, Markus |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: LF: Re: CW sked on 137 friday morning?, Stefan Schäfer |
---|---|
Next by Date: | LF: SAQ, Laurence KL7UK |
Previous by Thread: | LF: test, Markus Vester |
Next by Thread: | Re: LF: Re: test, Markus Vester |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |