Return to KLUBNL.PL main page

rsgb_lf_group
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: LF: Re: WSPR or QRSS: which is better?

To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: LF: Re: WSPR or QRSS: which is better?
From: [email protected]
Date: Wed, 24 Aug 2011 16:10:53 +0000
Importance: Normal
In-reply-to: <001b01cc6276$7aa1d170$0401a8c0@xphd97xgq27nyf>
References: <CAHAQVWOwLaz104cZGhvbLr23zt+03-J2yMBTVm+Cep-rKFTmvw@mail.gmail.com><001b01cc6276$7aa1d170$0401a8c0@xphd97xgq27nyf>
Reply-to: [email protected]
Sender: [email protected]
Sensitivity: Normal
Dinosaur! ;-) ned ludd of radio! Just teasing Mal!

Sent from my BlackBerry® wireless device


From: "mal hamilton" <[email protected]>
Date: Wed, 24 Aug 2011 16:57:08 +0100
Subject: LF: Re: WSPR or QRSS: which is better?

Roger
QRS is always better than wspr. Only one level of demodulation needed, just read the dots/dashes as displayed on screen, whereas wspr and other similar data modes need further demodulation, for example vy weak wspr traces that do not demodulate could easily be read had it been on/off keyed QRS mode.
QRS is also a good real time QSO mode, next best thing to normal CW
 
de mal/g3kev
 
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Wednesday, August 24, 2011 4:42 PM
Subject: LF: WSPR or QRSS: which is better?

A question for the coding experts here: WSPR is an excellent weak signal beaconing mode, but at what QRSS speed is QRSS "better" ?

73s
Roger G3XBM

--
http://g3xbm-qrp.blogspot.com/
http://www.g3xbm.co.uk
http://www.youtube.com/user/g3xbm
https://sites.google.com/site/sub9khz/

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>