Return to KLUBNL.PL main page
| To: | [email protected] |
|---|---|
| Subject: | LF: WSPR or QRSS: which is better? |
| From: | Roger Lapthorn <[email protected]> |
| Date: | Wed, 24 Aug 2011 16:42:21 +0100 |
| Dkim-signature: | v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=8BR/E9pSobei69UtBVSFkUhCD4ldGgh371P5BX5VBpQ=; b=tZX5eiDmC3p8MpXzPMk18k3AlgwVGjTK9J3VRUoHpV2NmpRNPqL2JG+c/Xh8aRuhFE 35HhzFnLK3zrxQjafX63N/Oc1l4QT4S+UXymOgZTJHp5aumEtWu1ztQ0sVrSbtG/MVOL lIk1TSoTO64aXHsqdxEWAL4Yq5wyD9PGehnt4= |
| Reply-to: | [email protected] |
| Sender: | [email protected] |
|
A question for the coding experts here: WSPR is an excellent weak signal beaconing mode, but at what QRSS speed is QRSS "better" ? 73s Roger G3XBM -- http://g3xbm-qrp.blogspot.com/ http://www.g3xbm.co.uk http://www.youtube.com/user/g3xbm https://sites.google.com/site/sub9khz/ |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: VLF: GQD TX off, pws |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | LF: Re: WSPR or QRSS: which is better?, mal hamilton |
| Previous by Thread: | LF: DK7FC in 4X, Chris 4X1RF |
| Next by Thread: | LF: Re: WSPR or QRSS: which is better?, mal hamilton |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |