Return to KLUBNL.PL main page

rsgb_lf_group
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: LF: Ferrite RX antennas

To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: LF: Ferrite RX antennas
From: Stefan Schäfer <[email protected]>
Date: Mon, 15 Aug 2011 02:16:47 +0200
In-reply-to: <00a501cc5ade$1dd83550$4001a8c0@lark>
References: <68BE37BD69E54DEE89CEBA8E30E9B94E@PcMinto> <[email protected]> <3ED8E5422F1F45DBB8186E9D9870AD63@PcMinto> <[email protected]> <938BF599006244949F6CDDB5BA91F347@PcMinto> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <op.vz74xbyxyzqh0k@pc-roelof> <[email protected]> <00a501cc5ade$1dd83550$4001a8c0@lark>
Reply-to: [email protected]
Sender: [email protected]
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; de; rv:1.9.1.8) Gecko/20100227 Thunderbird/3.0.3

Hi Alan,

We'll see. I just bought 16 pcs. 140 mm length and 8 mm diameter ferrite rods for 30 EUR (transport included) on ebay! 16 were available. The mu is 400, as written there. I hope the ferrite material is suitable for LF...

At least it will be worth the fun and for learning a bit about these antennas for amateur LF! I will compare to conventional antennas. So i can play with that type of "magic" antenna. Otherwise i could take e.g. 7 psc in parallel and that 2x in series. Should be OK for /p operation...

73, Stefan/DK7FC

Am 15.08.2011 01:58, schrieb Alan Melia:
I am afraid the tone of the article makes me a skeptic :-)) but if his first
former was 12mm diam and his bigger pictured one a120mm diameter the factor
A =100 in the conventional loop equation....so 20dB ...???????  extra
ferrite cross sectional area does help too, plus bigger former less turns
for the inductance less copper loss, higher Q (also increases the output).
Better but no magic!

For some experimental measurements see a Electonics World article  on Loops
by a couple of Itallian amatuers (app 2004 or 2005). Having said that there
may be some mileage in not winding the coil direct on the ferrite. Ferrite
is a lossy "semi-conductor" .It might be interesting to screen the core
electrostatically from the coil (it need a logitudinal slot to avoid a
shorted turn effect.) ....but this has probably been tried by many before.
Accurate comparative measurements on a reliable signal like DCF39 would be
much more interesting.

Alan G3NYK


----- Original Message -----
From: "Stefan Schäfer"<[email protected]>
To:<[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, August 15, 2011 12:08 AM
Subject: Re: LF: Ferrite RX antennas


Interesting!

Can anyone of the experts comment on this concept?

After scrolling down through pages of text i just found a few photos.
The mechanical concept is clear.
But the author appears almost esoteric to me, like a guru of that
antenna,  "_*The best compact AM antenna in the world - ever!"

*_So it is said that 20 ferrite rods in that arrangement perform 20 dB
better than a single rod. OK, but how well performs such a signgle rod?
20 dB is maybe not enough, compared to a well designed single turn loop,
which i have now.  My goal is always LF/137, not MF BCD stations or so.
The advantage of the ferrite solution, if sensitivity is sufficient to
be well above the noise on a quiet day, would be to be completely free
in all /p sesions (without a car).

Would it be possible to reasonable simulate that antenna (not an
accurate model but rather an estimation)?

73, Stefan/DK7FC


_*
*_Am 15.08.2011 00:04, schrieb Roelof Bakker:
Hello all,

If you have time to read it all, this might be interesting:

http://www.gmweb2.net/The%20FS%20Loop.htm

or Google for Ferrite Sleeve Loop.

73,
Roelof, pa0rdt


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>