Return to KLUBNL.PL main page

rsgb_lf_group
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: LF: Re: OT Waffle or Spam ? A different look at ZEVS

To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: LF: Re: OT Waffle or Spam ? A different look at ZEVS
From: Roger Lapthorn <[email protected]>
Date: Thu, 16 Jun 2011 16:46:35 +0100
Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=cMTEP2MEtmzGThWTmc9SnX3pMYWNaTtKdlK88MG24SM=; b=G3TGBgbhgMIjs35/z9ByIfn2/h6OD8wG40NGPB8CsT8phZ04mMVuP3iuKZmW4t/Xp2 ed/DJg2+2ysTINXZS8inir/1yCTcyJf4zX8qa90GnxKnJLOURTGsEHT6VxmPQFqiKFwn H5YOHUtQIi8diN0BxulrmErrTyOp3uU+1lnP4=
Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=I7T+pYcTshWLwUrho7Ibu6DNPElUk2RKwETMKXmaO68vyc3RMo+ZUS+NyidQhxjFxO wRI0TNwG/bkJkdRiURtW0VEjY26DynlxHVQ38fy3gOJvhDoP4ZOKH6s65IawDULl6hCE qaVpyD9H8oYSaEx0OL8NjyGjB1OiAADVNZ2cI=
Domainkey-status: good (testing)
In-reply-to: <[email protected]>
References: <[email protected]> <1DEEAA49EBA04DFC84153152C06B7B6A@IBM7FFA209F07C> <[email protected]>
Reply-to: [email protected]
Sender: [email protected]
Personally I can't see any harm with the ZEVS postings here. Keep them coming - it takes 2 seconds to delete them if not of interest, or zero seconds if you make a filter to bin emails with the word ZEVS.

Regarding the amateur VLF correspondence here, if this is where "the action" is currently, surely then these postings are OK.  There is a Yahoo group for those interested in sub-9kHz amateur radio, but most VLF news is posted here first.

Stefan, good luck at the weekend on VLF - I shall be looking for you on Saturday but we are away Sunday so will be unable to monitor then.

73s
Roger G3XBM




On 16 June 2011 13:00, qrss <[email protected]> wrote:
Hi Chris
I was only joking, heaven knows we don't want to start debating it, or feed the Mal.

Anyway an interesting view point all parts of which are easily countered.
Force fed - there are groups for VLF,ELF ULF, I delete hundreds of posting hourly which are of no interest to me it cause me me no pain.
Legal - this applies to all Wide views of VLF.
Drop off - Yes empty bands make you look elsewhere, erm VLF even. Currently signals on LF 3 or 4, members keen on ZEVS and doing real experimentation 8 or 9.

Motto always blame someone else:-)

73 Eddie.


On 16/06/2011 12:18, Chris wrote:
I don't think so, we're rather being force fed.
Not even sure it's legal to receive this signal under the terms of the various Wireless Telegraphy Acts, as it carries information and is not intended for general reception.
Mal and others have noticed a big drop off in 137/500kHz activity - this seems to me to have coincided with all this VLF stuff. Maybe we should rename the Reflector 'VLF' not 'LF' as it currently is!
Chris, G4AYT, Whitstable, Kent.
----- Original Message ----- From: "qrss" <[email protected]>
To: <[email protected]>
Sent: Thursday, June 16, 2011 11:55 AM
Subject: LF: OT Waffle or Spam ? A different look at ZEVS


ZEVS I think is of interest to sufficient members of the group at the
moment.:-)

A slightly improved set up, this morning was the first time that my ZEVS
Plot has given a lock over the full transmission.

 All DATA traces search a set window until they 'lock' onto the signal.
I have highlighted the locked periods.

73 Eddie G3ZJO









--
http://g3xbm-qrp.blogspot.com/
http://www.g3xbm.co.uk
http://www.youtube.com/user/g3xbm
https://sites.google.com/site/sub9khz/

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>