Hi Chris
I was only joking, heaven knows we don't want to start debating it, or
feed the Mal.
Anyway an interesting view point all parts of which are easily countered.
Force fed - there are groups for VLF,ELF ULF, I delete hundreds of
posting hourly which are of no interest to me it cause me me no pain.
Legal - this applies to all Wide views of VLF.
Drop off - Yes empty bands make you look elsewhere, erm VLF even.
Currently signals on LF 3 or 4, members keen on ZEVS and doing real
experimentation 8 or 9.
Motto always blame someone else:-)
73 Eddie.
On 16/06/2011 12:18, Chris wrote:
I don't think so, we're rather being force fed.
Not even sure it's legal to receive this signal under the terms of the
various Wireless Telegraphy Acts, as it carries information and is not
intended for general reception.
Mal and others have noticed a big drop off in 137/500kHz activity -
this seems to me to have coincided with all this VLF stuff. Maybe we
should rename the Reflector 'VLF' not 'LF' as it currently is!
Chris, G4AYT, Whitstable, Kent.
----- Original Message ----- From: "qrss" <[email protected]>
To: <[email protected]>
Sent: Thursday, June 16, 2011 11:55 AM
Subject: LF: OT Waffle or Spam ? A different look at ZEVS
ZEVS I think is of interest to sufficient members of the group at the
moment.:-)
A slightly improved set up, this morning was the first time that my ZEVS
Plot has given a lock over the full transmission.
All DATA traces search a set window until they 'lock' onto the signal.
I have highlighted the locked periods.
73 Eddie G3ZJO
|
