To: | "rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org" <rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org> |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: LF: VLF QRM puzzle - why not the same in a split screen on SL? |
From: | Chris Trayner <C.Trayner@leeds.ac.uk> |
Date: | Thu, 7 Apr 2011 17:45:43 +0100 |
Accept-language: | en-US, en-GB |
Acceptlanguage: | en-US, en-GB |
In-reply-to: | <4D9DE551.9020508@talktalk.net> |
References: | <BANLkTinhaEVLub3uu64PWWT1ZyZK6ooQyA@mail.gmail.com> <4D9DE551.9020508@talktalk.net> |
Reply-to: | rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org |
Sender: | owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org |
Thread-index: | Acv1QzxxusrYBsVfS3+jfFz80aMfyg== |
Thread-topic: | LF: VLF QRM puzzle - why not the same in a split screen on SL? |
On 7 Apr 2011, at 17:24, qrss wrote: > Considering they > originate from a 50Hz source they are strongest at lower frequencies, > rarely climbing above 6kHz but peaks sometimes get to 8.971kHz not much > higher.. Yes, but they disappear between 8970.03 Hz and 9876.57 Hz - that's a very small band for anything to knock them out. It's 0.00105 of an octave. If something is acting like a low-pass filter, at 6dB/octave/order, it'd have to be something like a 500th order filter to drop the signal by 3dB. I agree, it does look strange. 73, Chris G4OKW ----------------------- Dr Chris Trayner School of Electronic & Electrical Engineering, The University of Leeds, Leeds LS2 9JT, United Kingdom Tel: +44 113 34 32053 Fax: +44 113 34 32032 |
Previous by Date: | Re: LF: VLF QRM puzzle - why not the same in a split screen on SL?, Roger Lapthorn |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: LF: VLF QRM puzzle - why not the same in a split screen on SL?, qrss@talktalk.net |
Previous by Thread: | Re: LF: VLF QRM puzzle - why not the same in a split screen on SL?, qrss@talktalk.net |
Next by Thread: | Re: LF: VLF QRM puzzle - why not the same in a split screen on SL?, qrss@talktalk.net |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |