| To: | "[email protected]" <[email protected]> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: LF: VLF QRM puzzle - why not the same in a split screen on SL? |
| From: | Chris Trayner <[email protected]> |
| Date: | Thu, 7 Apr 2011 17:45:43 +0100 |
| Accept-language: | en-US, en-GB |
| Acceptlanguage: | en-US, en-GB |
| In-reply-to: | <[email protected]> |
| References: | <[email protected]> <[email protected]> |
| Reply-to: | [email protected] |
| Sender: | [email protected] |
| Thread-index: | Acv1QzxxusrYBsVfS3+jfFz80aMfyg== |
| Thread-topic: | LF: VLF QRM puzzle - why not the same in a split screen on SL? |
On 7 Apr 2011, at 17:24, qrss wrote: > Considering they > originate from a 50Hz source they are strongest at lower frequencies, > rarely climbing above 6kHz but peaks sometimes get to 8.971kHz not much > higher.. Yes, but they disappear between 8970.03 Hz and 9876.57 Hz - that's a very small band for anything to knock them out. It's 0.00105 of an octave. If something is acting like a low-pass filter, at 6dB/octave/order, it'd have to be something like a 500th order filter to drop the signal by 3dB. I agree, it does look strange. 73, Chris G4OKW ----------------------- Dr Chris Trayner School of Electronic & Electrical Engineering, The University of Leeds, Leeds LS2 9JT, United Kingdom Tel: +44 113 34 32053 Fax: +44 113 34 32032 |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: LF: VLF QRM puzzle - why not the same in a split screen on SL?, Roger Lapthorn |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: LF: VLF QRM puzzle - why not the same in a split screen on SL?, [email protected] |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: LF: VLF QRM puzzle - why not the same in a split screen on SL?, [email protected] |
| Next by Thread: | Re: LF: VLF QRM puzzle - why not the same in a split screen on SL?, [email protected] |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |