To: | <[email protected]> |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: VLF: field strength as a function of frequency curve... |
From: | "Alan Melia" <[email protected]> |
Date: | Wed, 13 Apr 2011 19:55:50 +0100 |
Dkim-signature: | v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=btinternet.com; s=s1024; t=1302721174; bh=yqRGW9vMUcq9MeXqMqhmE+KVw3sIJBF77+V+YCRL1z0=; h=Received:X-Yahoo-SMTP:X-YMail-OSG:X-Yahoo-Newman-Property:Message-ID:From:To:References:Subject:Date:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:X-Priority:X-MSMail-Priority:X-Mailer:X-MimeOLE:X-Antivirus:X-Antivirus-Status; b=VAIOsNTlQOgSNJkV9yE4YJ4nibPcz/HeRwzCSF9A9aWBeGkDwr0aDU1Xi3zfExhK4Xl+n2t8Ga2+YwwtwOoO4vlYVM8Xz8XJHtZllbAsbYtxzf7XPtZQW27nOVHh1vhdJH/p9+7ewpxlWxEZ25UhKQgBdCeos0hP0lKBnVWjeYY= |
Domainkey-signature: | a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=btinternet.com; h=DKIM-Signature:Received:X-Yahoo-SMTP:X-YMail-OSG:X-Yahoo-Newman-Property:Message-ID:From:To:References:Subject:Date:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:X-Priority:X-MSMail-Priority:X-Mailer:X-MimeOLE:X-Antivirus:X-Antivirus-Status; b=Fz15i/mkFJ9Z7uRTaT3N93+lIPM5Y1AIcfZNKGYX6L9RWXVDrGd+JYIMJaHnZz7Ja7lbrOlpT3f4y3jpKDQFNEwW3Z+AiFLcsEAF8zrJqpy8kbGoKoGoEVBaEcgw9OFAL1HDESPJkwNaE8HcXA/ULpqXhgHoJ5U3soWt4ka/ZIc= ; |
Domainkey-status: | good (testing) |
References: | <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> |
Reply-to: | [email protected] |
Sender: | [email protected] |
Same doc Stefan but the URL was about 4 chapters later ....also slightly interesting from VLF angle. I think its a fairly practical doc for the use of technicians, rather than a theoretical treatise. I had forgotten that site I found it several year ago but lost the URL. Alan G3NYK ----- Original Message ----- From: "Stefan Schäfer" <[email protected]> To: <[email protected]> Sent: Wednesday, April 13, 2011 7:16 PM Subject: Re: VLF: field strength as a function of frequency curve... Ah OK, sorry Scott. I haven't proved the document, just forwarded the link and checked the first page. Theoretical stuff isn't my central interest, you know ;-) 73, Stefan/DK7FC Am 13.04.2011 18:02, schrieb Scott Tilley: > Hi Stefan/group > > This looks it may be the link or at least a very interesting one: > > http://www.navy-radio.com/manuals/0101-1xx/0101_113-02.pdf > > 73 Scott > VE7TIL > > On 4/13/2011 5:28 AM, Stefan Schäfer wrote: >> VLF, >> >> Am 12.04.2011 23:30, schrieb Stefan Schäfer: >>> VLF, >>> >>> I've just got these graphs by a SWL (or better LWL) out of an >>> unknown paper. >> >> Now i've got the URL for this document: >> >> www.navy-radio.com/manuals/0101-1xx/0101_113-06.pdf >> >> >> 73, Stefan/DK7FC >> >> >> >>> It shows the results of field strength achievements as a function of >>> the TX frequency for different distances and a given TX power. >>> Have we all known about this? Me not ;-) Now i understand why the >>> military stations are located mostly between 15 and 25 kHz... >>> But 8970 Hz is not much worse, at least distances below 4000 km... >>> >>> But that graph tell me it is rather difficult to reach TF3HZ or >>> 4X1RF on 5170 Hz. Anyway we'll see... >>> >>> 73, Stefan/DK7FC >> >> > |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: VLF: field strength as a function of frequency curve..., Scott Tilley |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: LF: Earth mode tests at 1.095kHz today, Stefan Schäfer |
Previous by Thread: | Re: VLF: field strength as a function of frequency curve..., jcraig |
Next by Thread: | LF: 6.47khz, henny van elst |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |