Return to KLUBNL.PL main page

rsgb_lf_group
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: VLF: field strength as a function of frequency curve...

To: <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: VLF: field strength as a function of frequency curve...
From: "Alan Melia" <[email protected]>
Date: Wed, 13 Apr 2011 19:55:50 +0100
Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=btinternet.com; s=s1024; t=1302721174; bh=yqRGW9vMUcq9MeXqMqhmE+KVw3sIJBF77+V+YCRL1z0=; h=Received:X-Yahoo-SMTP:X-YMail-OSG:X-Yahoo-Newman-Property:Message-ID:From:To:References:Subject:Date:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:X-Priority:X-MSMail-Priority:X-Mailer:X-MimeOLE:X-Antivirus:X-Antivirus-Status; b=VAIOsNTlQOgSNJkV9yE4YJ4nibPcz/HeRwzCSF9A9aWBeGkDwr0aDU1Xi3zfExhK4Xl+n2t8Ga2+YwwtwOoO4vlYVM8Xz8XJHtZllbAsbYtxzf7XPtZQW27nOVHh1vhdJH/p9+7ewpxlWxEZ25UhKQgBdCeos0hP0lKBnVWjeYY=
Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=btinternet.com; h=DKIM-Signature:Received:X-Yahoo-SMTP:X-YMail-OSG:X-Yahoo-Newman-Property:Message-ID:From:To:References:Subject:Date:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:X-Priority:X-MSMail-Priority:X-Mailer:X-MimeOLE:X-Antivirus:X-Antivirus-Status; b=Fz15i/mkFJ9Z7uRTaT3N93+lIPM5Y1AIcfZNKGYX6L9RWXVDrGd+JYIMJaHnZz7Ja7lbrOlpT3f4y3jpKDQFNEwW3Z+AiFLcsEAF8zrJqpy8kbGoKoGoEVBaEcgw9OFAL1HDESPJkwNaE8HcXA/ULpqXhgHoJ5U3soWt4ka/ZIc= ;
Domainkey-status: good (testing)
References: <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]>
Reply-to: [email protected]
Sender: [email protected]
Same doc Stefan but the URL was about 4 chapters later ....also slightly
interesting from VLF angle. I think its a fairly practical doc for the use
of technicians, rather than a theoretical treatise. I had forgotten that
site I found it several year ago but lost the URL.

Alan G3NYK


----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Stefan Schäfer" <[email protected]>
To: <[email protected]>
Sent: Wednesday, April 13, 2011 7:16 PM
Subject: Re: VLF: field strength as a function of frequency curve...


Ah OK, sorry Scott. I haven't proved the document, just forwarded the
link and checked the first page. Theoretical stuff isn't my central
interest, you know ;-)

73, Stefan/DK7FC

Am 13.04.2011 18:02, schrieb Scott Tilley:
> Hi Stefan/group
>
> This looks it may be the link or at least a very interesting one:
>
> http://www.navy-radio.com/manuals/0101-1xx/0101_113-02.pdf
>
> 73 Scott
> VE7TIL
>
> On 4/13/2011 5:28 AM, Stefan Schäfer wrote:
>> VLF,
>>
>> Am 12.04.2011 23:30, schrieb Stefan Schäfer:
>>> VLF,
>>>
>>> I've just got these graphs by a SWL (or better LWL) out of an
>>> unknown paper.
>>
>> Now i've got the URL for this document:
>>
>> www.navy-radio.com/manuals/0101-1xx/0101_113-06.pdf
>>
>>
>> 73, Stefan/DK7FC
>>
>>
>>
>>> It shows the results of field strength achievements as a function of
>>> the TX frequency for different distances and a given TX power.
>>> Have we all known about this? Me not ;-) Now i understand why the
>>> military stations are located mostly between 15 and 25 kHz...
>>> But 8970 Hz is not much worse, at least distances below 4000 km...
>>>
>>> But that graph tell me it is rather difficult to reach TF3HZ or
>>> 4X1RF on 5170 Hz. Anyway we'll see...
>>>
>>> 73, Stefan/DK7FC
>>
>>
>


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>