To: | <[email protected]> |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: VLF: field strength as a function of frequency curve... |
From: | "Alan Melia" <[email protected]> |
Date: | Wed, 13 Apr 2011 17:26:23 +0100 |
Dkim-signature: | v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=btinternet.com; s=s1024; t=1302711980; bh=+Q84CZJazqh+Gkj/n0tUABkIHrNN+NZ17arsRjB/k2w=; h=Received:X-Yahoo-SMTP:X-YMail-OSG:X-Yahoo-Newman-Property:Message-ID:From:To:References:Subject:Date:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:X-Priority:X-MSMail-Priority:X-Mailer:X-MimeOLE:X-Antivirus:X-Antivirus-Status; b=GO1TWXtq93sKjvxljt7DnI2B5T/6mthLWuts/zIFIycclhdxvGTfSWUvecXlmcwQFrY8QgZWxuoATILH1NKDYfEbW3s6RXRvPuYXGmkYZwUqJaOXF2G7K/iR9StWpgXpuSxFzWft7eHhh1fHvX7Fe0HDZ0bphi90y14glMdECXM= |
Domainkey-signature: | a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=btinternet.com; h=DKIM-Signature:Received:X-Yahoo-SMTP:X-YMail-OSG:X-Yahoo-Newman-Property:Message-ID:From:To:References:Subject:Date:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:X-Priority:X-MSMail-Priority:X-Mailer:X-MimeOLE:X-Antivirus:X-Antivirus-Status; b=57bN6Pqjo28FIOC/m32gTQ47//Yq1OtRIGo15J23JnxGj2z/mI3Hni50rv50z4gMUgsDjaz6h0AxkMgqakbu8dsrg3KJpoLCNmEeItPulB6KIk8Jon4eAh1GJrVQgjygEE9nfCpimZx2csZgM5lLMR/TJ1M4PcTYWYeGqWyxRh0= ; |
Domainkey-status: | good (testing) |
References: | <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> |
Reply-to: | [email protected] |
Sender: | [email protected] |
Yes well done it was pg 31 of that chapter. Alan ----- Original Message ----- From: "Scott Tilley" <[email protected]> To: <[email protected]> Sent: Wednesday, April 13, 2011 5:02 PM Subject: Re: VLF: field strength as a function of frequency curve... > Hi Stefan/group > > This looks it may be the link or at least a very interesting one: > > http://www.navy-radio.com/manuals/0101-1xx/0101_113-02.pdf > > 73 Scott > VE7TIL > > On 4/13/2011 5:28 AM, Stefan Schäfer wrote: > > VLF, > > > > Am 12.04.2011 23:30, schrieb Stefan Schäfer: > >> VLF, > >> > >> I've just got these graphs by a SWL (or better LWL) out of an unknown > >> paper. > > > > Now i've got the URL for this document: > > > > www.navy-radio.com/manuals/0101-1xx/0101_113-06.pdf > > > > > > 73, Stefan/DK7FC > > > > > > > >> It shows the results of field strength achievements as a function of > >> the TX frequency for different distances and a given TX power. > >> Have we all known about this? Me not ;-) Now i understand why the > >> military stations are located mostly between 15 and 25 kHz... > >> But 8970 Hz is not much worse, at least distances below 4000 km... > >> > >> But that graph tell me it is rather difficult to reach TF3HZ or 4X1RF > >> on 5170 Hz. Anyway we'll see... > >> > >> 73, Stefan/DK7FC > > > > > > |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: VLF: field strength as a function of frequency curve..., Scott Tilley |
---|---|
Next by Date: | LF: RE: TEST 5.170kHZ., victor13 |
Previous by Thread: | Re: VLF: field strength as a function of frequency curve..., Scott Tilley |
Next by Thread: | Re: VLF: field strength as a function of frequency curve..., Stefan Schäfer |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |