|
Tracy
You are out of touch. I have been using Spectrum Lab for
some time and do not need it for the speeds that I use, however I did configure
it earlier and am receiving at this minute at qrs60.
With my array of largish antennas it is causing overload
and I would need a controlled interface between antenna and
soundcard.
I look forward to seeing a signal from you on VLF/LF or
MF, why the delay, go for it and forget about confession
g3kev
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Saturday, March 12, 2011 4:43
PM
Subject: Re: LF: VLF traces O/T
sorry
Dear Mal,
As Marcus said yesterday, why not download a
suitable version of a Spectrum Lab .usr file locked to GBZ and set about
looking for some of these very weak VLF signals you've not copied yet? G3XIZ
is probably copyable by you in a bandwidth that will not take that long to
display. Chris would appreciate the report. Likewise for some of the other
less strong European VLF stations.
If you need a suitable .usr file
several people here will send you one. It is not hard to run a very stable and
frequency accurate system - even I managed it with my crap set-up here, so for
an expert like you it should be easy.
We all understand you prefer real
QSOs with good IDs but please, give it a go. You will enjoy
it.
73s
Roger G3XBM
On 12 March 2011 16:17, mal hamilton <[email protected]>
wrote:
Some of you would believe anything !!!!!!!!!!!!! I
expect you go every Sunday and Wednesdays for Confession
Another version is nailed to the PLUS sign for those
that cannot read
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Saturday, March 12, 2011 3:25
PM
Subject: Re: LF: VLF traces O/T
sorry
Hi Gary, Graham (Billy) LF No very radio that, I
prefer Luke 14:28, (and it's not nail him to a torture
stake) Eddie On 12/03/2011 15:09, Gary - G4WGT wrote:
Graham, LF,
It looks pretty close to me, are you some kind of "book worm"
finding/knowing these quotes ?? Hi.
73, Gary - G4WGT.
On 12 March 2011 11:47, Graham <[email protected]> wrote:
Acts
20:35 may be applicable in this case
?
--------------------------------------------------
From:
"mal hamilton" <[email protected]>
Sent: Saturday, March
12, 2011 8:43 AM
To: <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: LF:
VLF traces
Yes
Markus
But I do not intend to wait hours, weeks and months to
observe a signal at
rediculous narrow bandwidths. My limit of
time is QRS 60 and preferably
Faster.
We need the transmitting
stations to increase power ie more ERP then there
would be no
need for uH bandwidths and year long dashes hi
de
mal/g3kev
----- Original Message -----
From: "Markus
Vester" <[email protected]>
To: <[email protected]>
Sent: Friday,
March 11, 2011 9:30 PM
Subject: Re: LF: VLF traces
Dear
Mal,
with all due respect, I very much disagree
here.
Whenever I see a clear trace appear at the right time
and within a milliHz
of a confirmed and correctly calibrated
frequency, I have hardly a doubt
about the validity of the
reception. Even more so if the transmission
can
be
verified
by comparison to a calibrated grabber in another
location.
It seems that the G3KEV antenna does have
excellent sensitivity at VLF. It
would be fantastic if you
could augment that with a stable, properly
calibrated, and
narrowband reception system. SpecLab has made that so easy
now
- throw out the wildly drifting "receiver", connect your
antenna
directly to the soundcard instead, lock to one of your
MSK neighbours (GBZ
or GQD), and your in the game.
Best
regards,
Markus (DF6NM)
From: mal hamilton
Sent:
Friday, March 11, 2011 5:57 PM
To: rsgb
Subject: LF: VLF
traces
I can see a couple of vy weak traces around 8970
but this is no guarantee
who it might be because there is no
ID. Frequency alone is not a VALID
report- it could be
anything.
G3KEV
--
g3xbm-qrp.blogspot.com/
www.g3xbm.co.uk
www.youtube.com/user/g3xbm
G3XBM GQRP 1678 ISWL
G11088
|
