Yes Markus
But I do not intend to wait hours, weeks and months to observe a signal at
rediculous narrow bandwidths. My limit of time is QRS 60 and preferably
Faster.
We need the transmitting stations to increase power ie more ERP then there
would be no need for uH bandwidths and year long dashes hi
de mal/g3kev
----- Original Message -----
From: "Markus Vester" <[email protected]>
To: <[email protected]>
Sent: Friday, March 11, 2011 9:30 PM
Subject: Re: LF: VLF traces
> Dear Mal,
>
> with all due respect, I very much disagree here.
>
> Whenever I see a clear trace appear at the right time and within a milliHz
> of a confirmed and correctly calibrated frequency, I have hardly a doubt
> about the validity of the reception. Even more so if the transmission can
be
> verified by comparison to a calibrated grabber in another location.
>
> It seems that the G3KEV antenna does have excellent sensitivity at VLF. It
> would be fantastic if you could augment that with a stable, properly
> calibrated, and narrowband reception system. SpecLab has made that so easy
> now - throw out the wildly drifting "receiver", connect your antenna
> directly to the soundcard instead, lock to one of your MSK neighbours (GBZ
> or GQD), and your in the game.
>
> Best regards,
> Markus (DF6NM)
>
>
> From: mal hamilton
> Sent: Friday, March 11, 2011 5:57 PM
> To: rsgb
> Subject: LF: VLF traces
>
>
> I can see a couple of vy weak traces around 8970 but this is no guarantee
> who it might be because there is no ID. Frequency alone is not a VALID
> report- it could be anything.
> G3KEV
>
>
>
|
