To: | <[email protected]> |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: LF: HGA22 plot |
From: | "Alan Melia" <[email protected]> |
Date: | Sat, 19 Feb 2011 13:41:44 -0000 |
Dkim-signature: | v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=btinternet.com; s=s1024; t=1298122911; bh=qWoxpOiDu4O+BClGeiixPMVlU/zy0JdreWYYH3/Dyd8=; h=Received:X-Yahoo-SMTP:X-YMail-OSG:X-Yahoo-Newman-Property:Message-ID:From:To:References:Subject:Date:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:X-Priority:X-MSMail-Priority:X-Mailer:X-MimeOLE:X-Antivirus:X-Antivirus-Status; b=6O+lLsgEJOo7o1CVWs57OgFbOnv9/99iFCXD/MXCPv31UPpv0OjuWvn6gP0SeXZsVtfBPlfpOMG23HUzMuZe6zy03qTCIVdQh9BX81A1Zd5EVp54l/MLVa/u5qdju0OvKf0Jg/JnTNwBCDAMRi0CWt9iDzByqDy3LwcY7n95bgk= |
Domainkey-signature: | a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=btinternet.com; h=DKIM-Signature:Received:X-Yahoo-SMTP:X-YMail-OSG:X-Yahoo-Newman-Property:Message-ID:From:To:References:Subject:Date:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:X-Priority:X-MSMail-Priority:X-Mailer:X-MimeOLE:X-Antivirus:X-Antivirus-Status; b=yaTqoccsgh+QCpn9DPsco+m4Ss4L94b28oe5HVyQ6koLobuKRN1NDhMWRcxiB1hagYiNDa44J5Z+1UeARLaioRbUcAWql/Ly+uWSnMHhz8HFCFJ0LqI8G/Oj2OEidk4jEoLIcwDQTOyeBssqnqRoCE1hqK+d3EKyGVIqgc0Kge0= ; |
Domainkey-status: | good (testing) |
References: | <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> |
Reply-to: | [email protected] |
Sender: | [email protected] |
Hi Both, musing....if one used a very narrow capture bandwidth could that be cause by "ringing" after the telegrams ....they are usually around 10 secs apart?? Alan G3NYK ----- Original Message ----- From: "wolf_dl4yhf" <[email protected]> To: <[email protected]> Sent: Saturday, February 19, 2011 9:44 AM Subject: Re: LF: HGA22 plot > Hi Dex, > > you wrote: > > I had moved the plot to 60 khz before I read your suggestion Wolf. > > Here's what I am seeing tonight: > > > > http://www.w4dex.com/lf/HGA22_0030_19feb11.jpg > > > Interesting, the sine-shaped pattern is still there - and the > 'oscillation' frequency is suspiciously constant. > Would be interesting to see an FFT of the signal strength plot, to see > how stable the frequency of the 'AM' is. To do that, one would have to > export the data as a text file (which is possible), and import it into > some post-processing software like matlab (which I don't have myself). > Which function (especially the observed bandwidth for that signal) did > you use to plot it, the peak function or the power (or effective > voltage), in which frequency range ? > > I'd like to plot the same signal with the same BW here, just for > comparison. I don't think I will have two different reflective layers on > the signal path... > > 73, > Wolf . > > |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | LF: RE: TA ... last night, Martin Packer |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: LF: TA ... last night, jrusgrove |
Previous by Thread: | Re: LF: HGA22 plot, wolf_dl4yhf |
Next by Thread: | Re: LF: HGA22 plot, pws |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |