Return to KLUBNL.PL main page
| To: | [email protected] |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: LF: Transmissions on 8970Hz |
| From: | Daniele Tincani <[email protected]> |
| Date: | Sun, 23 Jan 2011 03:10:28 -0800 (PST) |
| Dkim-signature: | v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yahoo.com; s=s1024; t=1295781028; bh=eNMkld6taPyIA63kDnUm/mfWWM2mFdPe6m11p83Oqkw=; h=Message-ID:X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:References:Date:From:Subject:To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=AcbeiVo2sQCzrEykq6BoyTtkyHIdCibxFRqTScA69876QldVbweurGB0wcT3AOprk3NSVCivxghmZZGfnOonAXRvqKkx8d6xGC55AqlcFTQQrfJ0P3i6NcHaeseuM7fzn3qhFt0ORo6fd2mJdmtdkjCtjsFdpwgBhSRU2Wom6Aw= |
| Domainkey-signature: | a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=Message-ID:X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:References:Date:From:Subject:To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=ypjRaKOwXN9l2p4q+ut7ePB3rQNq7WjzUWbKECb62RlF9ncGlWYkNzGLHotCtXoXx5ALPO4GmJT54CcPV81GZSN3uxlm+upQXjvRWbXQvz5Hlh3CyIExZFNkbmwyvqFrZFOq1HC2MagYCRV6ZQtx4vNOprxRtjbMfVGmBYmJtiI=; |
| Domainkey-status: | good (testing) |
| In-reply-to: | <41E6D616029D49FDA12AD9982B8A5BD9@White> |
| References: | <[email protected]><6F6098420211436FABB78BE04E5F8FAD@JimPC><000901cb6215$2db60550$0401a8c0@xphd97xgq27nyf><[email protected]><B4EA2F5BDC754BC0AD7DFE6ABD01E8A2@Black><25B77CFFDA13430086BE150894C4D3C3@Black><5C71BB4133A642F7A2D06B26B567880D@Black><B3AD784C916249F4868766DF79832B71@Black><65DFBC8F38CD4AF48A62C61B6BC4DCC4@Black><D99F306913F545BA9A80F5AFA1D36175@JimPC><[email protected]><[email protected]><[email protected]><[email protected]><[email protected]> <[email protected]> <41E6D616029D49FDA12AD9982B8A5BD9@White> |
| Reply-to: | [email protected] |
| Sender: | [email protected] |
|
Currently my SpecLab window covers from 8969.95 to 8970.05 (so 8970Hz +- 50mHz) with 141uHz FFT and 10 minutes waterfall scroll interval. Initially I started with 3mHz FFT and 60 seconds per scroll (as during Stefan's tests) but I soon realized it was not enough for today's tests in my local hum conditions. I will see if the above described settings work better.
Best regards
Daniele
From: Markus Vester <[email protected]> To: [email protected] Sent: Sun, January 23, 2011 11:43:50 AM Subject: Re: LF: Transmissions on 8970Hz Gary, if you'd place your carrier within +-70 mHz of 8970.0, you might have a chance to appear on Stefan's 0.42 mHz "6000" grabber.
Good luck,
Markus
I am planning to carry out tests on 8.968kHz from about 1200utc. Starting with continuous carrier for 1 hour or longer & then a short message at QRSS600 which will be repeated if time allows.
Any reports or comments will be welcome.
73
Gary - G4WGT - IO83qo.
On 23 January 2011 08:54, Daniele Tincani <[email protected]> wrote:
|
| Previous by Date: | Re: LF: VX9MRC 507.77 kHz, Gary - G4WGT |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | LF: DG3MDE test loop, Markus Vester |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: LF: Transmissions on 8970Hz, Markus Vester |
| Next by Thread: | Re: LF: Transmissions on 8970Hz, Gary - G4WGT |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |