Return to KLUBNL.PL main page

rsgb_lf_group
[Top] [All Lists]

LF: Re: RE: Thick Litz wire needed, and more on class E PA development

To: <[email protected]>
Subject: LF: Re: RE: Thick Litz wire needed, and more on class E PA development
From: "mal hamilton" <[email protected]>
Date: Sat, 22 Jan 2011 18:36:41 -0000
References: <[email protected]> <BF4A524700075746A6467658DFC7102C88715AEAA6@ICTS-S-EXC2-CA.luna.kuleuven.be>
Reply-to: [email protected]
Sender: [email protected]
Around 10 uH is the right value for L on 500. This is what I use and it does not get HOT.
g3kev
 
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Saturday, January 22, 2011 6:31 PM
Subject: LF: RE: Thick Litz wire needed, and more on class E PA development

Hello Andy,
 
with 9.3UH the class E amp must have a rather high Q (12 ?). Maybe a lower Q (and more or less proportional lower L) might help ?
 
73, Rik  ON7YD - OR7T
 

Van: [email protected] [[email protected]] namens Andy Talbot [[email protected]]
Verzonden: zaterdag 22 januari 2011 18:14
Aan: [email protected]
Onderwerp: LF: Thick Litz wire needed, and more on class E PA development

Is there still any of the really thick Litz wire from the old Decca stations around?   I'm after about 3 to 3.5 metres of whatever is available that is thicker than 3mm, and preferably nearer 3.5mm diameter.    Enough to make a 9.3uH coil
 
The Tank coil in the latest version of the class E PA under test is now the power-determining item.   At 450 Watts output the heatsink with fan is COLD - but the coil annoyingly smells of hot varnish.
It is wound with the cotton covered Litz, about 2.5mm overall diameter which itself is a big improvement over the plastic covered stuff I was using for the breadboard.  But, I have the surreal situation that as teh coil gets hot, teh wire expands, inductance falls and due to the nature of the combined Tank + L-Match circuitry causes a resulting increase in powser output - leadign to higher dissipation and you can guess what will eventually happen if left unchecked.
 
One soluition will be to duct air from the fan through the coil, but I'd feel happier if loses were lower to start with.
 
At reduced Vdd it reaches stability running at 400 Watts without getting too hot and increasing itself spontaneously.
 
Efficiency, by the way, variously measures at 86 - 94%.  So I'll say around 88%.    Hard to believe, but I have been over everything and double checks, and can't get teh value below 84% however much I try to push errors in the worst direction.
 
The FETs are now a pair of IRFP360, and the  driver chip had to be replaced - the poor ICL7667 just went bang and split itself open driving them.  The copper of the PCB tracks running under it became discoloured so it must have bene running very hot before dying  Now using a pair of SMT TC4420 devices - one per FET -  with additional copper heat dissipating fins on the PCB.    They've survived so far.
 
Its been delivering  320 Watts for an hour now off a 37V rail, so at that power level is certainly reliable; brief forays up to a 55V rail gave slightly over 700 Watts - and I could see current rising as I watched due to the coil expanding, so didn't hold it there for long, but does mean the PA as it stands could be used with AM/envelope modulation.
 
The shack is getting quite warm now !
A second chapter to the write-up will appear in due course
 
Andy
 
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>