Return to KLUBNL.PL main page

rsgb_lf_group
[Top] [All Lists]
<prev [Date] next>
[Advanced]
 <prev [Thread] next>

Re: VLF: strange propagation effects on VLF

from [Alan Melia] [Permanent Link][Original]
To: "RSGB LF Gp" <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: VLF: strange propagation effects on VLF
From: "Alan Melia" <[email protected]>
Date: Wed, 3 Nov 2010 21:08:07 -0000
Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=btinternet.com; s=s1024; t=1288818490; bh=4h0J+z7nOX1/FHy7VzrETpJoVcpUuYiX86RJE1AdAcQ=; h=Received:X-Yahoo-SMTP:X-YMail-OSG:X-Yahoo-Newman-Property:Message-ID:From:To:References:Subject:Date:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:X-Priority:X-MSMail-Priority:X-Mailer:X-MimeOLE:X-Antivirus:X-Antivirus-Status; b=TMd+UAb1yz2IWOG89UOFFesIIMDeNId7dBc+NGh+ILed2WhbGP/yJmV93VCBcZ+MbU3V/33aazegdl8VZwOWjn5MnvDZN1jx5Qzpjc+Hshp9uEVtBJZnnBvOYdJTC20bz5m0qNFaMySwh1dsaIq9K6ylKESa2Nhd0eo1l/tpL6U=
Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=btinternet.com; h=DKIM-Signature:Received:X-Yahoo-SMTP:X-YMail-OSG:X-Yahoo-Newman-Property:Message-ID:From:To:References:Subject:Date:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:X-Priority:X-MSMail-Priority:X-Mailer:X-MimeOLE:X-Antivirus:X-Antivirus-Status; b=ixTNGhhOE+Vyt0gpunNiv7c7DwBqgKODxaSaoXT15ksT2XRBzhNDi1sqD63BYdyQ1VpCc4/qAJRzPKH9D51zToaNfOlXQ6OpTwiGkEqXFeM+edECoHVswQoTWm/JhBFym0m/Ly08usimom0ZICLcOmhHVewRlboeygelfhCymco= ;
Domainkey-status: good (testing)
References: <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <007401cb7b97$bc896470$8cd9160a@EFREMOV>
Reply-to: [email protected]
Sender: [email protected] 
Andrey it should accept more than that now....that used to be the limit in
the " old days". It is nearer 100kb(total including attachment, repeats,
HTML commands-if any, and tails) now I think.
Alan G3NYK

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "rn3agc" <[email protected]>
To: <[email protected]>
Sent: Wednesday, November 03, 2010 8:43 PM
Subject: Re: VLF: strange propagation effects on VLF


> OK Stefan :)
> http://rn3agc.msk.ru/vlf.jpg
>
> (by the way, @blacksheep.org for some reason doesn't
> accept from me the message more ~30-40 kb)
>
> 73
> Andrey
>
>
> > Hi Andrey,
> >
> > Yes, indeed ;-) But now you must send the capture to the reflector since
> > no one except me (and you) can see the capture ;-)
> >
> > 73, Stefan
> >
> > Am 03.11.2010 21:19, schrieb rn3agc:
> >> Stefan, look also at my capture, there the same effect..
> >>
> >> 73
> >> Andrey
> >>
> >>
> >>> VLF,
> >>>
> >>> There are strange propagation effects going on on VLF in the last
> >>> days. I just observed that there was a significant _sudden_
> >>> rise/enhancement of all the signal levels arround 12:15 UTC. This
> >>> effect is observed on 3 spectrograms, DF6NM's 4X1RF's(some minutes
> >>> later) and DK7FC's grabber so it cannot be an accident. See the
> >>> pictures.
> >>> How can this be possible? It seems the autumn and winther period
> >>> provides some interesting effects there which are not completely
> >>> understood, at least by me ;-)
> >>>
> >>> 73, Stefan/DK7FC
> >>>
> >>>
> >
>
[More with this subject...]
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Previous by Date:  Re: LF: 501150, pa3abk
Next by Date:  Re: LF: 501150, Paul-Henrik
Previous by Thread:  Re: VLF: strange propagation effects on VLF, rn3agc
Next by Thread:  Re: VLF: strange propagation effects on VLF, Marco IK1ODO
Indexes:  [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]