Return to KLUBNL.PL main page

rsgb_lf_group
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: LF: VLF THOUGHT

To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: LF: VLF THOUGHT
From: Steve Dove <[email protected]>
Date: Thu, 02 Sep 2010 02:01:14 +0000
In-reply-to: <003b01cb49fc$89767860$0401a8c0@xphd97xgq27nyf>
References: <000a01cb493d$fb8f3410$0401a8c0@xphd97xgq27nyf><[email protected]><BF4A524700075746A6467658DFC7102C63821D3C97@ICTS-S-EXC2-CA.luna.kuleuven.be><[email protected]><002501cb49f0$acabccb0$0401a8c0@xphd97xgq27nyf> <[email protected]> <003b01cb49fc$89767860$0401a8c0@xphd97xgq27nyf>
Reply-to: [email protected]
Sender: [email protected]
User-agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.6 (Windows/20050716)

Hi Mal, Warren,

You both have points, and misapprehensions, in about even measure.

In still, homogeneous air, the results are as Warren states. They did after all measure all this stuff once upon a time. On doing system design for Very Big rock shows we used those figures as a basis for what went on low in the stacks for close in to the stage, and in the upper levels for further out in the crowd; very different configurations. The delay towers a couple of hundred meters out had similar upper/lower constraints. And all these were adjusted on-the-fly with respect to temperature and humidity which both and in combination radically affect air attenuation vs. frequency.

But the response from communities miles and miles away (as per Jim) belied the theory totally! The complaints - often with cassettes! - showed that given pretty average summer-evening temperature inversion ducting the shows could be 'enjoyed' widely. No real highs, but the vocals were understandable and the tunes recognizable.

Most interesting on the tapes, though, was occasional frequency-dependent dispersion or perhaps different paths / modes; the bass and kick drum often seemed 'out-of-sync' with the rest. I put this down to the bass-bins being effectively omnidirectional, whilst everything else had the advantage of stacking gain, directional cabinets, or horns; they could well excite different modes. Alternatively the LF was arriving through normal 'ground wave', and the rest through ducting.

Amplifier power ran typically 100-200kW overall over four frequency bands, but speaker efficiencies meant that it probably wasn't ever much more than a handful of acoustic kW, and certainly not from a point source.

Sirens ARE very close to point source and save the frictional losses are very mechanical-to-acoustically efficient; the SPLs they can generate are fabulous and which easily rival or excel those of a mondo festival PA. Albeit at one note.

High audio frequencies ARE difficult to make travel - I remember having 15dB of gain at 15kHz on an already small-horn-heavy upstairs array to hit the back of a stadium still sounding decent. And the 'next-town-over' tapes certainly had little above 2kHz on them.

The parallels with RF are striking in that DX is possible beyond the dogmatically theoretical but only by odd 'propagation' modes. But, like high audio frequencies, all this really isn't going very far, is it?

        73

                Steve



<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>