Return to KLUBNL.PL main page

rsgb_lf_group
[Top] [All Lists]
<prev [Date] next>
[Advanced]
 <prev [Thread] next>

Re: LF: QRS600

from [Scott Tilley] [Permanent Link][Original]
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: LF: QRS600
From: Scott Tilley <[email protected]>
Date: Fri, 10 Sep 2010 15:30:36 +0000
In-reply-to: <000a01cb50bc$73df5140$0301a8c0@your91hoehfy9g>
References: <000a01cb50bc$73df5140$0301a8c0@your91hoehfy9g>
Reply-to: [email protected]
Sender: [email protected]
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.9.2.8) Gecko/20100802 Thunderbird/3.1.2
My QRO unit can pump out 2KW all night long if needed key down. This isn't really a problem with good thermal engineering.

 Scott
VE7TIL

On 9/10/2010 7:47 AM, mal hamilton wrote:
How many transmitters could stand this duty cycle, especially the QRO versions. The time needed to send a full callsign for ID could well burn the TX out.
Those using QRS 120 in the past for prolonged periods reported problems.
g3kev
 
[More with this subject...]
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Previous by Date:  Re: LF: QRS600, mal hamilton
Next by Date:  Re: LF: Request for modification of Argo, Stefan Schäfer
Previous by Thread:  LF: RE: QRS600, Rik Strobbe
Next by Thread:  Re: LF: QRS600, mal hamilton
Indexes:  [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]