Return to KLUBNL.PL main page

rsgb_lf_group
[Top] [All Lists]
<prev [Date] next>
[Advanced]
 <prev [Thread] next>

Re: LF: QRS600

from [Scott Tilley] [Permanent Link][Original]
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: LF: QRS600
From: Scott Tilley <[email protected]>
Date: Fri, 10 Sep 2010 20:57:58 +0000
In-reply-to: <002101cb5100$d7676b00$0401a8c0@xphd97xgq27nyf>
References: <000a01cb50bc$73df5140$0301a8c0@your91hoehfy9g> <[email protected]> <002101cb5100$d7676b00$0401a8c0@xphd97xgq27nyf>
Reply-to: [email protected]
Sender: [email protected]
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.9.2.8) Gecko/20100802 Thunderbird/3.1.2

She only dances at the 137KHz party.



On 9/10/2010 3:57 PM, mal hamilton wrote:
Thats a mighty big TX but will the atu/caps and antenna wire stand it especially on 9 K/cs
 
g3kev
 
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Friday, September 10, 2010 4:30 PM
Subject: Re: LF: QRS600

My QRO unit can pump out 2KW all night long if needed key down. This isn't really a problem with good thermal engineering.

 Scott
VE7TIL

On 9/10/2010 7:47 AM, mal hamilton wrote:
How many transmitters could stand this duty cycle, especially the QRO versions. The time needed to send a full callsign for ID could well burn the TX out.
Those using QRS 120 in the past for prolonged periods reported problems.
g3kev
 
[More with this subject...]
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Previous by Date:  LF: G3XPU new station on 600m, F4DTL
Next by Date:  Re: LF: Request for modification of Argo Time base, Alan Melia
Previous by Thread:  Re: LF: QRS600, mal hamilton
Next by Thread:  Re: LF: QRS600, Graham
Indexes:  [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]