Return to KLUBNL.PL main page

rsgb_lf_group
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: LF: QRS600

To: <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: LF: QRS600
From: "Graham" <[email protected]>
Date: Fri, 10 Sep 2010 17:08:28 +0100
Importance: Normal
In-reply-to: <002101cb5100$d7676b00$0401a8c0@xphd97xgq27nyf>
References: <000a01cb50bc$73df5140$0301a8c0@your91hoehfy9g> <[email protected]> <002101cb5100$d7676b00$0401a8c0@xphd97xgq27nyf>
Reply-to: [email protected]
Sender: [email protected]
2 KW all  day  long .........  and here's me with  25 watts to 35 ft of wire   with a coke  bottle on the  end   decoding over 650K in day light .. no need  to even  switch the  fan on ..same band , different planet  !
 
G
 
 

Sent: Friday, September 10, 2010 4:57 PM
Subject: Re: LF: QRS600

Thats a mighty big TX but will the atu/caps and antenna wire stand it especially on 9 K/cs
 
g3kev
 
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Friday, September 10, 2010 4:30 PM
Subject: Re: LF: QRS600

My QRO unit can pump out 2KW all night long if needed key down. This isn't really a problem with good thermal engineering.

 Scott
VE7TIL

On 9/10/2010 7:47 AM, mal hamilton wrote:
How many transmitters could stand this duty cycle, especially the QRO versions. The time needed to send a full callsign for ID could well burn the TX out.
Those using QRS 120 in the past for prolonged periods reported problems.
g3kev
 


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>