To: | [email protected] |
---|---|
Subject: | LF: RE: earth antenna |
From: | Mike-WE0H <[email protected]> |
Date: | Tue, 20 Jul 2010 14:06:18 -0500 |
In-reply-to: | <BF4A524700075746A6467658DFC7102C51094D0E53@ICTS-S-EXC2-CA.luna.kuleuven.be> |
References: | <[email protected]> <[email protected]>,<[email protected]> <BF4A524700075746A6467658DFC7102C51094D0E53@ICTS-S-EXC2-CA.luna.kuleuven.be> |
Reply-to: | [email protected] |
Sender: | [email protected] |
User-agent: | Thunderbird 2.0.0.24 (X11/20100317) |
In the USA we call that a SWAG (Scientific Wild Ass Guess) Mike-WE0H Rik S wrote: Stefan,based on the theory that an earth antenna is a loop and assuming that the "height" of the loop remains unchanged, increasing the length from 280m to 600m should increase the loop area (A) by 2.14 . As the radiation resistance of a loop is proportional the A^2 the radiation resistance should increase by 4.6. If the loss resistance remains unchanged the improvement should be almost 7dB. But notice the use of assuming, should and if ... so just a guess. 73, Rik ON7YD |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: VLF: earth antenna, Roger Lapthorn |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: LF: Re: 3C90 toroids - good service from Farnell UK, Graham |
Previous by Thread: | LF: RE: earth antenna, Rik Strobbe |
Next by Thread: | Re: VLF: earth antenna, Roger Lapthorn |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |