Return to KLUBNL.PL main page

rsgb_lf_group
[Top] [All Lists]

R: LF: RE: QRP

To: <[email protected]>
Subject: R: LF: RE: QRP
From: <[email protected]>
Date: Tue, 1 Jun 2010 17:11:00 +0200
References: <9B1ACF98A3384489B37FABB5028106E9@IBM7FFA209F07C><000001cb017b$c56e81b0$0202a8c0@laptopcore2> <[email protected]>
Reply-to: [email protected]
Sender: [email protected]
Thread-index: AcsBgEi80g5hvi7GTxi1ppWiuvXkXQAHFxTe
Thread-topic: LF: RE: QRP
Hello Roger, LF,
what could it be the corresponding attitude for a radio listener, in your 
opinion?
Cheers
D.

________________________________

Da: [email protected] per conto di Roger Lapthorn
Inviato: mar 01/06/2010 13.42
A: [email protected]
Oggetto: Re: LF: RE: QRP


There is a time and a place for both QRO and QRP.


*   QRO is useful to "extend possibilities" by exploiting new modes of 
propagation or when lower power simply wouldn't be enough e.g. moon bounce on 
UHF, scatter modes on microwaves, or frontier DX work on 8.97kHz. 
    
*   QRP time and again proves to me that, in very many situations, high power 
is both a waste of time and energy. On HF a few watts (even handheld) is enough 
to work the world on SSB as well as CW, even in sunspot minimum years. It just 
takes a little more effort and skill both on the part of the TXing station and 
on the RXing station. On MF last winter 1mW ERP was enough to achieve far more 
than I could have wished for and I appreciated the efforts made by many to 
detect my weak signals, including Mal working me on CW.
    

QRP is a personal choice and it has been my personal interest for most of my 
ham operating life: it is fun, gear is simple and inexpensive to make, TVI is 
never an issue and energy requirements are minimal. It is not for everyone and 
I respect that, but I do commend it.

73s
Roger G3XBM



On 1 June 2010 12:15, g3zjo <[email protected]> wrote:


    >Absolutely CORRECT Mal, I totally agree.

    >Chris, G4AYT.

     

                I don't want to join in with any tit for tat stuff, please 
don't lets go there.

     

    Mal has very good antennas I am sure he can receive my 500kHz QRPp signal 
although he has never admitted it.

    Lee M0LMH, the Bloodhound, certainly can at 194km 120miles under flat 
conditions; he can also set up a Grabber and display my signal.

     

    So lets draw a circle 120miles radius from IO92ng. Any station within that 
circle should be able to receive my signal too, given a not too fantastic set 
up, I think Lee has described his set up in that way. If they can't, then their 
Receiver or Antenna could be improved and also enable them to receive signals 
from, say the Czech Republic.

     

    Would me increasing my power until I can be seen on the Broad Band Grabbers 
improve the performance of their set up, because now they would most likely 
receive me. Or does QRO cover for mediocre RX and Antennas.

     

    A stupid question but no worse than some of the prior 'Stupid Criminals' 
posts.

     

    Eddie G3ZJO 

     

     

                




-- 
http://g3xbm-qrp.blogspot.com/
http://www.g3xbm.co.uk <http://www.g3xbm.co.uk/> 
http://www.youtube.com/user/g3xbm
G3XBM    GQRP 1678      ISWL G11088

<<winmail.dat>>

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>