To: | [email protected] |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: VLF: RX stations in Canada and US? |
From: | "Mike.WE0H" <[email protected]> |
Date: | Mon, 07 Jun 2010 15:28:13 -0500 |
In-reply-to: | <003201cb066f$eb54a280$0401a8c0@xphd97xgq27nyf> |
References: | <657E7065AC4C454AB63F6C7C2FF043F6@Black> <[email protected]> <003101cb04c2$0913cc10$0401a8c0@xphd97xgq27nyf> <1607287044.1492139.1275754813942.JavaMail.fmail@mwmweb034> <BF4A524700075746A6467658DFC7102C5107CB1257@ICTS-S-EXC2-CA.luna.kuleuven.be> <38A51B74B884D74083D7950AD0DD85E82A1C24@File-Server-HST.hst.e-technik.tu-darmstadt.de> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <38A51B74B884D74083D7950AD0DD85E82A1C28@File-Server-HST.hst.e-technik.tu-darmstadt.de> <002001cb066b$9d0ddd70$0401a8c0@xphd97xgq27nyf> <[email protected]> <003201cb066f$eb54a280$0401a8c0@xphd97xgq27nyf> |
Reply-to: | [email protected] |
Sender: | [email protected] |
User-agent: | Thunderbird 2.0.0.24 (X11/20100317) |
Ah yes that NOV thing. Over here 9kc and down is free to use. Bummer for the UK guys stuck with the NOV thing. Mike WE0H Mal wrote: Mike In the UK most are opposed to big signals if what you read on here is true. If I lived in the USA it would be a different story, especially way out west, some amateur radio stations in California rival the commercials. W6AM and W6HX were better equipped than the local BC and Coastal stations. I have been to both. g3kev |
Previous by Date: | Re: VLF: RX stations in Canada and US?, Roger Lapthorn |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: VLF: RX stations in Canada and US?, mal hamilton |
Previous by Thread: | Re: VLF: RX stations in Canada and US?, mal hamilton |
Next by Thread: | RE: VLF: RX stations in Canada and US?, Rik Strobbe |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |