Return to KLUBNL.PL main page
| To: | <[email protected]> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: VLF: RX stations in Canada and US? |
| From: | "mal hamilton" <[email protected]> |
| Date: | Mon, 7 Jun 2010 19:33:26 +0100 |
| References: | <657E7065AC4C454AB63F6C7C2FF043F6@Black> <[email protected]> <003101cb04c2$0913cc10$0401a8c0@xphd97xgq27nyf> <1607287044.1492139.1275754813942.JavaMail.fmail@mwmweb034> <BF4A524700075746A6467658DFC7102C5107CB1257@ICTS-S-EXC2-CA.luna.kuleuven.be> <38A51B74B884D74083D7950AD0DD85E82A1C24@File-Server-HST.hst.e-technik.tu-darmstadt.de> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <38A51B74B884D74083D7950AD0DD85E82A1C28@File-Server-HST.hst.e-technik.tu-darmstadt.de> <002001cb066b$9d0ddd70$0401a8c0@xphd97xgq27nyf> <[email protected]> |
| Reply-to: | [email protected] |
| Sender: | [email protected] |
Mike In the UK most are opposed to big signals if what you read on here is true. If I lived in the USA it would be a different story, especially way out west, some amateur radio stations in California rival the commercials. W6AM and W6HX were better equipped than the local BC and Coastal stations. I have been to both. g3kev ----- Original Message ----- From: "Mike.WE0H" <[email protected]> To: <[email protected]> Sent: Monday, June 07, 2010 7:17 PM Subject: Re: VLF: RX stations in Canada and US? > Build it and others will follow. Go for that big CW signal. If you don't > try, maybe nobody else will. > > Mike > WE0H > |
| Previous by Date: | Re: VLF: RX stations in Canada and US?, mal hamilton |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | RE: VLF: RX stations in Canada and US?, James Cowburn |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: VLF: RX stations in Canada and US?, Mike.WE0H |
| Next by Thread: | Re: VLF: RX stations in Canada and US?, Mike.WE0H |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |