Return to KLUBNL.PL main page

rsgb_lf_group
[Top] [All Lists]

RE: LF: FW: EME / 500/-1 0- 2.5 Watts per stream

To: "[email protected]" <[email protected]>
Subject: RE: LF: FW: EME / 500/-1 0- 2.5 Watts per stream
From: Rik Strobbe <[email protected]>
Date: Mon, 3 May 2010 16:17:11 +0200
Accept-language: nl-NL, nl-BE
Acceptlanguage: nl-NL, nl-BE
In-reply-to: <24A9F372D1DD41D095B505A551032F7B@AGB>
References: <B2DE0B93724F41E28BF5ACAA5646AC77@AGB> <A9FE0044F30346A5A4BB9BDA12B37401@AGB> <7E3FA25571354834A324CF53C8B07FF2@AGB> <243C54244F5A43BB90D4BD0A3E9D5A2D@AGB> <5069A7E9DC9246C3B343D3CEE8395549@AGB>,<A38EA40C4E6E42A1A46BCD96E8B8D7D3@AGB>,<BF4A524700075746A6467658DFC7102C19A2156EA5@ICTS-S-EXC2-CA.luna.kuleuven.be> <BF4A524700075746A6467658DFC7102C19A2156EA8@ICTS-S-EXC2-CA.luna.kuleuven.be>,<24A9F372D1DD41D095B505A551032F7B@AGB>
Reply-to: [email protected]
Sender: [email protected]
Thread-index: AcrqwWJ17m4FZNkuRH2QtjF+SQDTKQACe/r1
Thread-topic: LF: FW: EME / 500/-1 0- 2.5 Watts per stream
Graham,
 
I guess that in theory the 500Hz version should be better (FM with a better modulation index ?)
But only if noise is uniform.
 
What about a simultanious session ROS-EME / JT4C ? Both have about the same bandwith.
 
73, Rik  ON7YD
 

Van: [email protected] [[email protected]] namens Graham [[email protected]]
Verzonden: maandag 3 mei 2010 15:02
Aan: [email protected]
Onderwerp: Re: LF: FW: EME / 500/-1 0- 2.5 Watts per stream

Thanks  Rik
 
Well  that  was not  supposed to  happen .. hihi .. Jose had expected the  500/1 to  give the  best  copy ..... 
 
73 - G ..

Sent: Monday, May 03, 2010 8:17 AM
Subject: LF: FW: EME / 500/-1 0- 2.5 Watts per stream

Graham,
 
this is what I copied last night, but due to some oddity of the refelcter the message did not come through:
 

Van: Rik Strobbe
Verzonden: zondag 2 mei 2010 23:56
Aan: [email protected]
Onderwerp: RE: EME / 500/-1 0- 2.5 Watts per stream

Graham,
 
500Hz:

RX1: <21:18 UTC> <9,3 Hz> XG0NBD@HOTL>:78.W(:2:Y>9O5CMG44 <CANCEL> <-30 dB>

RX1: <21:23 UTC> <9,3 Hz> <G0NBD@HOTMAO\.CKM> 1234567890:) <STOP> <-31 dB>

RX1: <21:28 UTC> <9,8 Hz> <G0NBD@HEX2\>Q>COAD$,R2-F678:3B8#S)(H TZHV8+YJBP7_(B"B%/@YNAJI=$VF,+ZUT1_BN <CANCEL> <-35 dB>

RX1: <21:37 UTC> <9,8 Hz> <G0NBD@HOTMAIN"3$Z!234569SPAJ7%^_6+ <CANCEL> <-38 dB>

RX1: <21:42 UTC> <9,3 Hz> <EX>BEPHM<>%P27B*//C(?NJ>(M3U:[NWH <STOP> <-35 dB>

RX1: <21:47 UTC> <9,3 Hz> <G0NBH@HOM:_7Y/>N5ZH2347C4>\$7?MYX-V <CANCEL> <-37 dB>

RX1: <21:52 UTC> <9,3 Hz> <G0NBD@HOTMAJ"QO<6VP& 34560:) /FVD#TN HZ?]<(T_V#U4T5AZ <CANCEL> <-32 dB>

 
EME:

RX1: <21:18 UTC> <13,2 Hz> <[email protected]> 1234567890:) <STOP> <-25 dB>

RX1: <21:23 UTC> <12,7 Hz> <[email protected]> 1234567890:) <STOP> <-22 dB>

RX1: <21:28 UTC> <12,7 Hz> <[email protected]> 1234567890:) <STOP> <-29 dB>

RX1: <21:33 UTC> <12,7 Hz> <[email protected]> 2 C?5< H92")G>] <CANCEL> <-35 dB>

RX1: <21:37 UTC> <12,7 Hz> <[email protected]> 1234567890:) <STOP> <-29 dB>

RX1: <21:42 UTC> <12,7 Hz> <[email protected]>I>Q&?Y^GW^A8P& <STOP> <-33 dB>

RX1: <21:47 UTC> <12,7 Hz> <[email protected]> 1234567890:) <STOP> <-29 dB>

RX1: <21:51 UTC> <12,7 Hz> <[email protected]> 1234567890:) 10W <CANCEL> <-31 dB>

 

My vote goes to EME mode ;-)

 

73, Rik  ON7YD - OR7T

 

Van: [email protected] [[email protected]] namens Graham [[email protected]]
Verzonden: zondag 2 mei 2010 23:48
Aan: [email protected]
Onderwerp: LF: EME / 500/-1 0- 2.5 Watts per stream

Will reduce to  approx 2.5 Watt's  per  stream at 2300  local
 
Tnx  for  reports G ..
 
 

From: Graham
Sent: Sunday, May 02, 2010 10:24 PM
Subject: Re: LF: EME / 500/-1 0- 10 Watts per stream

Reduced to  10  watts  per  steam  22-30  hrs local
 
Tnx - G .
 
 

From: Graham
Sent: Sunday, May 02, 2010 10:13 PM
Subject: Re: LF: EME / 500/-1 0- 25 Watts per stream

Reduced to  25  watts  per stream , added 1234567890 to the text
Tnx  for  reports
 
G .

From: Graham
Sent: Sunday, May 02, 2010 9:40 PM
Subject: LF: EME / 500/-1 0- 40 Watts per stream

As of  21-15  local time power  set ..40  watts  per  data  stream  (may be  too  much ?)
 
NB : Pls  run  x2 session's  of ros   for  comparative  test
 
Will  run till  round  midnight
 
Thanks  for the  reports  via  the  email  system  and the  ref
 
73 - G

From: Graham
Sent: Sunday, May 02, 2010 8:28 PM
Subject: LF: ROS EME / 500/-1 0- Reduced power

I am reducing power to  1 watt  Ae feed  to  allow  Gary  to  do  some low level  checks
will  qro  later
 
G ..

From: Graham
Sent: Sunday, May 02, 2010 7:10 PM
Subject: LF: ROS EME / 500/-1 Bit speed 502.00 KHz

Dual mode  ROS Beacon running , check  for  activity >> http://www.wireless.org.uk/grab/
 
ROS    EME
 
ROS    500 Hz / 1 Bit  speed
Dial  set  502.000 KHz USB
 
Dual reception by  running  two  sessions  of  ROS . , set  eme  and  HF  500 rx  1  bit  speed
select the  minimum  AFC  range
 
The  HF  500/1 bit  should  out  perform the  eme  mode
Software  download >>  http://rosmodem.wordpress.com/
Reports  welcome via  ref  or the  auto  email  mode
 
Note  - Due to  low af  drive  level - NO RX -
 
Tnx - G .














<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>