Return to KLUBNL.PL main page

rsgb_lf_group
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: LF: AW: 8.97kHz - Near field and radiated signals?

To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: LF: AW: 8.97kHz - Near field and radiated signals?
From: Jacek Lipkowski <[email protected]>
Date: Fri, 28 May 2010 14:24:57 +0200 (CEST)
In-reply-to: <[email protected]>
References: <[email protected]> <38A51B74B884D74083D7950AD0DD85E82A1C00@File-Server-HST.hst.e-technik.tu-darmstadt.de> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]>
Reply-to: [email protected]
Sender: [email protected]

On Wed, 26 May 2010, Roger Lapthorn wrote:

  - What antenna did you use for RX? Loop, e-field probe?

i used an e-field probe

  - Have you tried TXing using grounded electrodes? If so, what range did
  you achieve and what RX antenna did you use?

i've tried to couple to various structures (underground wires etc), one of them worked like a ground dipole. i got around 750m with 1.8W: http://acid.ch.pw.edu.pl/~sq5bpf/ham/vlf/20100203/vlfcapt3747.jpg this was in february, during summer the distance would have been smaller.

this is from a bit shorter distance, around 570m: http://acid.ch.pw.edu.pl/~sq5bpf/ham/vlf/20100203/vlfcapt3744.jpg i have tried using 40W into a 1.5x2.5m 3 turn loop - in this case there was marginal copy at the same location (can't find the spectrogram unfortunately). as you can see in this case it's much better than marginal.

i've used a loop for both tests. i've tried the location 1.3km away (that was not a problem for e-field antennas), but didin't receive anything. actually i would be surprised to receive something at 1.3km, it it was marginal with half of this distance. so you can see that at least in my case the e-fields antenna clearly wins

btw performing these tests in the city is not just a matter of turning on the tx and driving around. you have to search for quiet sites to listen, and drive there.

jacek


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>