Return to KLUBNL.PL main page

rsgb_lf_group
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: LF: Earth electrodes

To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: LF: Earth electrodes
From: Roger Lapthorn <[email protected]>
Date: Thu, 27 May 2010 16:53:43 +0100
Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:in-reply-to :references:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=8I+PgpQ8PMafa5mSOBuMaI242kh1cR4h2CXHCH2oNDw=; b=GQchMtyrjBERCc3/R+bhbSsb7SoLYVOu2Bi+7ifJe8luDmRXDDdgQ2mAcjVcGPpIKW sbByNNyP0YUZfV934ZC4RoVEqWWAXVlnubpWyh9qo+DJMGCDnXVDR8OKE2h5G/Fxjfp0 nJQH55qb4Zj0z0YXt4ZHBY/iVwLmVvRHnrct8=
Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=gLrBXWq2q1+zRWOQWhfIxCWjjUVyEgrg6gX05GGhS6B2ivG08CDnFayLzU2Avv9XkQ lSF6Iu3ncyuYmnRkqklYdNufLE6V3KIHL8ACQpclk3L2C8qmPMMeHsrDiGoqYf6jx0eC aw+8t//CmECPjbg3VbSJJKuy0AWCmBwOZX5jU=
Domainkey-status: good (testing)
In-reply-to: <[email protected]>
References: <[email protected]> <38A51B74B884D74083D7950AD0DD85E82A1C00@File-Server-HST.hst.e-technik.tu-darmstadt.de> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <BF4A524700075746A6467658DFC7102C5106464EEA@ICTS-S-EXC2-CA.luna.kuleuven.be> <[email protected]> <BF4A524700075746A6467658DFC7102C5106464EEB@ICTS-S-EXC2-CA.luna.kuleuven.be> <BF4A524700075746A6467658DFC7102C5106464EEC@ICTS-S-EXC2-CA.luna.kuleuven.be> <[email protected]> <38A51B74B884D74083D7950AD0DD85E82A1C0A@File-Server-HST.hst.e-technik.tu-darmstadt.de> <1016715129.3429947.1274945594131.JavaMail.fmail@mwmweb033> <[email protected]>
Reply-to: [email protected]
Sender: [email protected]
A paper I read suggested multiple small rods were as good as one large one where the ground prevented deep insertion of a larger rod, such as in a cave.

73s
Roger G3XBM



On 27 May 2010 14:13, John Bruce McCreath <[email protected]> wrote:

Hello LFers,

While laying in bed this morning pondering the inside of my eyelids I got to thinking about the electrodes used
for "through the earth" communications.  What is more important, the depth of the electrode or its surface area?
A typical 3/4 inch diameter by 4 foot long ground rod has a surface area of 113 square inches, while a metal
plate 1 foot square has a surface area of 288 square inches.  If depth is the key, then obviously the rods have
the advantage, but if it's surface area, the plates win hands down.  Even in stoney soil, it's relatively easy to
make a slit-like hole into which could be slipped a sheet of galvanized metal with a lead attached.  To make
a good connection to the surrounding soil, pour some "kitty litter" into the slit and moisten it with water so as
to improve the contact between the plate and the surrounding soil.  Am I onto something here or have I
overlooked some important detail?

73, J.B., VE3EAR

LowFER Beacon "EAR"
188.830 kHz. QRSS30









--
http://g3xbm-qrp.blogspot.com/
http://www.g3xbm.co.uk
http://www.youtube.com/user/g3xbm
G3XBM    GQRP 1678      ISWL G11088
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>