To: | [email protected] |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: LF: Re: Re: E-Field Probe calibration question |
From: | Andy Talbot <[email protected]> |
Date: | Thu, 1 Apr 2010 20:58:25 +0100 |
Dkim-signature: | v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:received:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=nBVV6ZplQ5nsj3JoQM0pTVOthQSJwGGydWjQhsbhumU=; b=XbXK54EjrZr8K8f2AyMwn8c5AfHrR+tL7Shlyn5D3SHGg2DMRS5JjtvfiOaUYFbVg2 SV0zTrrpkJbUVbqzTUKm9JpQKsaG1VOhh92F1MLWHaVEZUpNdwcH4Xzrkd1I8WFYK5OA 2vTG9J/yc7gvoDcIOU7gOCRcgRwcvOGLoCYXQ= |
Domainkey-signature: | a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=RoPAux+RLOSXGv6gINRXP1BDcTquZNHvXVo+LW+c+SmMhBQXtuwlVxv9Dh7zq1AtXV zTZoGox4rYkTuea6g09bQvztEdw+5Dvewo6CygX1o37ddh0G1hJAnXcsf2SJByrSNov9 T6kmnrfNHkzi2m0msUG0DYaim+sy2Y43HAfnk= |
Domainkey-status: | good (testing) |
In-reply-to: | <841031C22EC944FEB2BB3E1DC237717E@acer3f31164f8b> |
References: | <[email protected]> <001d01cad190$aa92e590$0901a8c0@lark> <841031C22EC944FEB2BB3E1DC237717E@acer3f31164f8b> |
Reply-to: | [email protected] |
Sender: | [email protected] |
On the basis of two measurements out in the field - the results suggests the voltage being picked up is slightly more than the effective length as stated, but resukts for such a quick first approxiomation are in teh right region:
At two /P monitoring sites at distances of 3.5 and 14km, the measured power was calculated back to a field strength using the quoted antenna factor, then this E field was related to ERP using the standard equation.
At 3.5km the ERP worked out at around 200mW which isn't too far from what I thought it was from Rloss / Rrad calculations. BUT, the Rx was surrounded by trees and a power cable close by, so could reasonably be expected to be lower than it should be.
The second site was in the middle of flat land, at the top of a Hill (Lane End Down for those microwavers on this reflector), where there were virtually no local screening. ERP calculated back to 900mW. This result is too high, suggesting the E-Field probe antenna is picking up more signal than it ought to. I need to make some more measurements further afield, and to compare with a loop before coming to any conclusion - but an afternoon pleasently spent getting a measurement in the right region at least.
On 1 April 2010 13:05, Mike McAlevey <[email protected]> wrote: Hi Andy. |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | LF: Re: RE: info F8boj wspr, Claude Berthebaud |
---|---|
Next by Date: | VLF: 4th VLF experiment by DK7FC/p, Stefan Schäfer |
Previous by Thread: | LF: Re: Re: E-Field Probe calibration question, Mike McAlevey |
Next by Thread: | VLF: 4th VLF experiment by DK7FC/p, Stefan Schäfer |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |