To: | [email protected] |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: LF: Re: DK7FC's 2nd VLF TX test... |
From: | Paul Nicholson <[email protected]> |
Date: | Mon, 15 Mar 2010 07:09:04 +0000 |
In-reply-to: | <84F995E5B17847E2B1BE8D3C99723F98@Black> |
References: | <000a01cac139$b9d5e5a0$0401a8c0@xphd97xgq27nyf> <9D7C2F9B306347BEA848AC1560D1162B@JimPC> <[email protected]> <38A51B74B884D74083D7950AD0DD85E82A1B54@File-Server-HST.hst.e-technik.tu-darmstadt.de> <38A51B74B884D74083D7950AD0DD85E82A1B56@File-Server-HST.hst.e-technik.tu-darmstadt.de> <84F995E5B17847E2B1BE8D3C99723F98@Black> |
Reply-to: | [email protected] |
Sender: | [email protected] |
User-agent: | Thunderbird 2.0.0.14 (X11/20080421) |
Good luck with the test Stefan. Today looks like a good day - no thunderstorms in Europe, low background noise, less than 0.7fT in 5mHz this morning and it is still falling. Rx here has been recalibrated and the software improved to stabilise the frequency - it is staying mostly within 1mHz, http://abelian.org/vlf/nb.shtml 20kV RMS may just bring in a signal about equal to the noise floor here, so I wont see it. But you never know, with some favourable propagation, a cooperative D layer...I will still look :) Notes on rx calibration and frequency stabilisation here, http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/VLF_Group/message/15490 http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/VLF_Group/message/15492 -- Paul Nicholson -- |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | LF: Re: DK7FC's 2nd VLF TX test..., Markus Vester |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: LF: DK7FC's 2nd VLF TX test..., Paul Nicholson |
Previous by Thread: | LF: Re: DK7FC's 2nd VLF TX test..., Markus Vester |
Next by Thread: | Re: LF: DK7FC's 2nd VLF TX test..., Paul Nicholson |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |