To: | [email protected] |
---|---|
Subject: | LF: 9kHz: soundcard RX |
From: | Horst Stöcker <[email protected]> |
Date: | Wed, 3 Mar 2010 10:32:33 +0100 (CET) |
Importance: | normal |
In-reply-to: | <38A51B74B884D74083D7950AD0DD85E82A1B2C@File-Server-HST.hst.e-technik.tu-darmstadt.de> |
References: | <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <op.u8xyu1djyzqh0k@pc1> <[email protected]>, <38A51B74B884D74083D7950AD0DD85E82A1B2C@File-Server-HST.hst.e-technik.tu-darmstadt.de> |
Reply-to: | [email protected] |
Sender: | [email protected] |
Sensitivity: | Normal |
>And what about a simple band pass filter to supress the 50Hz and it's >harmonics? Necessary or dispensable? You can hear (!) the difference. I just took a 10mH coil from Reichelt to improve my soundcard-RX before one of the last SAQ activities. Despite of more or less excellent digital filtering of SpecLab it's a good idea. One should not keep the soundcard busy with unwanted signals. What I am not sure about is the use of an audio transformer. It might have some influence to the signal. As it just has to keep the soundcard from beeing blown it might be a good idea to take a cheap soundcard instead of the audio transformer - and maybe a second in spare. Stefan, what USB-soundcard you bought for 10 EUR ? Horst DO1KHS ___________________________________________________________ GRATIS für alle WEB.DE-Nutzer: Die maxdome Movie-FLAT! Jetzt freischalten unter http://movieflat.web.de |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | LF: VX9MRC 03-03.jpg, henny van elst |
---|---|
Next by Date: | LF: Re: yesterday evening CPM on 136.317KHz, henny van elst |
Previous by Thread: | AW: LF: Re: 9kHz noise level, Stefan Schäfer |
Next by Thread: | Re: LF: 9kHz: soundcard RX, M0FMT |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |