To: | [email protected] |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: AW: LF: RE: Re: VLF_8.79 kHz |
From: | Andy Talbot <[email protected]> |
Date: | Thu, 25 Feb 2010 12:34:17 +0000 |
Dkim-signature: | v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=HZHDRrb4ETsdshtMEnRxWp6ZJvbPe8B027YkUzgQagg=; b=itHk9dG2UWFmDSY6zLGYJi/GML52C5jPPVsHUpKH5SF/ALWMBHF55xw+pQCWjPH57m 6OHl7Ve8FUsgvrNj8Rbpv2uTqfOKckaulUiRvuGwc7/nwrEiDMVbUibDeUchhrPT53wG X2F5Ix5ntWG6YfdOd2BgRIkbFG80tnoDg8G4o= |
Domainkey-signature: | a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=TCRUOVkRXJyT1Bq9akt97PbLxig8bS0sgBP5QhfYV97QFeCAFn3ADdw43ojAdNsIQX aLJIbvLiFycW2KsYhhQL5Lqj7DBW2zQTYMI8X9lm7zGCsMbquPjtlaUGgjLXk7faY9+1 NWiOjlBqg8rsfIHPgJ/3715Xu70ew3dNj9XX8= |
Domainkey-status: | good (testing) |
In-reply-to: | <op.u8omd2vbyzqh0k@pc1> |
References: | <[email protected]> <38A51B74B884D74083D7950AD0DD85E82A1B1A@File-Server-HST.hst.e-technik.tu-darmstadt.de> <op.u8omd2vbyzqh0k@pc1> |
Reply-to: | [email protected] |
Sender: | [email protected] |
Yes, but what is the gain / antenna factor of your Miniwhip?
Measuing -115dBm means little in itself, you need to convert this to a calibrated V/m form.
IF the miniwhip were exactly 1m long and positioned over a good groundplane, fed an infinite input impedance, zero input capacitance voltage follower amp with unity voltage gain into 50 ohms, then -115dBm would equate to 0.4uV/m in 24Hz, or .08uV/m/ SQRT Hz.
If the value quoted recently of 150dB kTB is assumed, which is 25dB lower that my original calculation, it suggests a value in the region of 4uV / m / SQRT Hz may be more typical.
On 25 February 2010 12:02, Roelof Bakker <[email protected]> wrote: Hello Andy, |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | RE: LF: AW: 9 Dreamers, Alexander S. Yurkov |
---|---|
Next by Date: | LF: Re: VLF test signals?, jrusgrove |
Previous by Thread: | Re: AW: LF: RE: Re: VLF_8.79 kHz, Roelof Bakker |
Next by Thread: | Re: AW: LF: RE: Re: VLF_8.79 kHz, Roelof Bakker |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |