Return to KLUBNL.PL main page

rsgb_lf_group
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: LF: Re: WSPR beacon

To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: LF: Re: WSPR beacon
From: John P-G <[email protected]>
Date: Fri, 04 Sep 2009 23:31:59 +0000
In-reply-to: <4665B875CFA448B4A21984B1800E57BF@radiorummet>
References: <8E070AD22619484C9E2D22046F45C521@JimPC> <4665B875CFA448B4A21984B1800E57BF@radiorummet>
Reply-to: [email protected]
Sender: [email protected]
User-agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.23 (Windows/20090812)

Hello all,

Nice signals from all WSPRers

I see there's a disagreement amongst you about whether to report ERP or TX power. Is there an agreed standard for this on MF/LF?

Jim, Gary & Gus seem to report ERP and Graham reports TX power. This makes Graham's spots look poorer than they should be.

I remember some discussion a few months ago about this, but can't remember the concensus that was reached. It would be good though if you all did the same thing, to gove a consistent approach and to allow better comparison between S/N, Distance and Power.

Cheers,

John
GM4SLV

Gus wrote:
Dear Jim and group,

this evening i run WSPR beacon with abt 10 dB more power.


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>