Return to KLUBNL.PL main page
| To: | [email protected] |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: LF: Re: WSPR beacon |
| From: | John P-G <[email protected]> |
| Date: | Fri, 04 Sep 2009 23:31:59 +0000 |
| In-reply-to: | <4665B875CFA448B4A21984B1800E57BF@radiorummet> |
| References: | <8E070AD22619484C9E2D22046F45C521@JimPC> <4665B875CFA448B4A21984B1800E57BF@radiorummet> |
| Reply-to: | [email protected] |
| Sender: | [email protected] |
| User-agent: | Thunderbird 2.0.0.23 (Windows/20090812) |
Hello all, Nice signals from all WSPRersI see there's a disagreement amongst you about whether to report ERP or TX power. Is there an agreed standard for this on MF/LF? Jim, Gary & Gus seem to report ERP and Graham reports TX power. This makes Graham's spots look poorer than they should be. I remember some discussion a few months ago about this, but can't remember the concensus that was reached. It would be good though if you all did the same thing, to gove a consistent approach and to allow better comparison between S/N, Distance and Power. Cheers, John GM4SLV Gus wrote: Dear Jim and group, this evening i run WSPR beacon with abt 10 dB more power. |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: LF: WSPR beacon, Graham |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: LF: WSPR beacon, John P-G |
| Previous by Thread: | LF: Re: WSPR beacon, Gus |
| Next by Thread: | Re: LF: Re: WSPR beacon, Graham |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |