To: | [email protected] |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: LF: RE: SSB-Beacon |
From: | Rik Strobbe <[email protected]> |
Date: | Tue, 12 May 2009 09:11:15 +0200 |
In-reply-to: | <406BFF543DA74618A3CA53F315277917@radiorummet> |
References: | <[email protected]> <D1B04AE7FA04475CA50E9FE566D21D8D@AGB> <406BFF543DA74618A3CA53F315277917@radiorummet> |
Reply-to: | [email protected] |
Sender: | [email protected] |
Gus, Dave, Graham, I guess even the Q of the antenna can attenuate the low and/or high tones. In theory with a SSB bandwidth of 2.7kHz and a operating frequency of 505kHz a Q = 180 would cause a 3 dB attenuation at the ends. But from my experience results could even be worse: Although the Q of my antenna is only 50 I notice a significant power reduction if I tune the antenna mid-band (502.5kHz) and QSY to one of the band edges without re-tuning. I assume that the PA is rather "allergic" to a even rather small reactive part of the load. In addition the fading on 500 can indeed be very frequency-selective. During Graham's 3 mode test I could notice different QSB patterns between the 3 signals (that were only some 100 Hz apart). 73, Rik ON7YD - OR7T At 00:40 12/05/2009, you wrote: I agree ! What is the valve of inductor ? |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: LF: SSB-Beacon, Paul-Henrik |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: LF: Re: Re: 500kHz Portable, Mike Dennison |
Previous by Thread: | Re: LF: RE: SSB-Beacon, Gus |
Next by Thread: | Re: LF: RE: SSB-Beacon, Graham |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |